So I'm running out of space on my current drives (WD Caviar Blue 1tb) and I'm considering purchasing another. However, if I do so I'd like to run it in RAID-0, to make it easier to find everything.
Everyone says that RAID-0 has a higher fault rate, but as I understand it, that is because if one drive fails, then it causes the entire thing to fail. However, my question is does RAID actually put additional stress on the hard drive, or is the higher fault chance just because one drive failing is catastrophic to it?
If I do decide to go with RAID, the only thing on the drive will be media, nothing important will go on it.
Everyone says that RAID-0 has a higher fault rate, but as I understand it, that is because if one drive fails, then it causes the entire thing to fail. However, my question is does RAID actually put additional stress on the hard drive, or is the higher fault chance just because one drive failing is catastrophic to it?
If I do decide to go with RAID, the only thing on the drive will be media, nothing important will go on it.