i7 4790k high temperatures ?

Sazirgaming

Reputable
Jun 29, 2015
20
0
4,510
Hello guys im using a cooler master seidon 120v water cooling unit and intel i7 4790k cpu and my idle tempature is around 30-35 degrees with programs like chrome/steam open and sometimes maxium 70 while gaming , battlefield 4 , cs go (4k) , gta 5 and others. Is this normal ?
 
Solution
Guys,

Do not accept IntelTurtleFan's statement that 85C is OK ... it is NOT. He is misinformed.

The CPU tests in OCCT will terminate at 85C because it's too hot.

Here's the normal operating range for Core temperature:

80C Hot (100% Load)
75C Warm
70C Warm (Heavy Load)
60C Norm
50C Norm (Medium Load)
40C Norm
30C Cool (Idle)


Intel's Thermal Specification is "Tcase", which is CPU temperature, not Core Temperature. Core temperature is 5C higher than CPU temperature due to the differences in sensor type, location and calibration.

Tcase for the i7 4790K is 74C...

Dunlop0078

Titan
Ambassador
No not really for a water cooler I think the stock intel cooler reaches about mid seventy's for most people while gaming i would think your water cooler would do better however im not really familiar with that cooler. You could have put on too much or too little thermal paste or you could be applying uneven pressure to the cpu because you tightened one side of the water block more than the other. Or thats just the way the cooler performs.
 

LetsPlayThisBro

Honorable
Mar 14, 2015
377
0
10,810


85C sustained is ok? I've overclocked mine to 4.5ghz on air and I'm getting high 70's with a peak of 81C on one core the last few times I've tested. If 85C can be sustained without detriment to the lifespan of the chip I'd be tempted to reach for a 4.6ghz OC.

Meantime I'm moving from air to water when I get my new case in a couple months. Looking to push 4.7ghz with hopes of hitting 4.8ghz if I can keep it stable and cool enough. I get nervous once I get mid-70's though I mean I do want to get a full lifespan from this chip.

EDIT: Not stock air by the way, I have a Noctua NH-U14S.
 

CompuTronix

Intel Master
Moderator
Guys,

Do not accept IntelTurtleFan's statement that 85C is OK ... it is NOT. He is misinformed.

The CPU tests in OCCT will terminate at 85C because it's too hot.

Here's the normal operating range for Core temperature:

80C Hot (100% Load)
75C Warm
70C Warm (Heavy Load)
60C Norm
50C Norm (Medium Load)
40C Norm
30C Cool (Idle)


Intel's Thermal Specification is "Tcase", which is CPU temperature, not Core Temperature. Core temperature is 5C higher than CPU temperature due to the differences in sensor type, location and calibration.

Tcase for the i7 4790K is 74C: http://ark.intel.com/products/80807/Intel-Core-i7-4790K-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-4_40-GHz

Tcase + 5 makes the corresponding Core temperature 79C. <-- This is the spec.

Intel desktop processors have thermal sensors for each Core, plus a sensor for the entire processor, so a Quad Core has five sensors. Heat originates within the Cores where Digital sensors measure Core temperatures. A single Analog sensor under the Cores measures overall CPU temperature.

The relationship between Core temperature and CPU temperature is not in the Thermal Specifications; it's only found in a few engineering documents. In order to get a clear perspective of processor temperatures, it's important to understand the terminology and specifications, so please read this Tom’s Sticky:

Intel Temperature Guide - http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-1800828/intel-temperature-guide.html

CT :sol:
 
Solution

CompuTronix

Intel Master
Moderator
I appreciate your positive attitude. :D

We live in a technical world where all our gadgets run 24 / 7 based upon standards and specifications. Since 2007, my goal here at Tom's has been to clarify Intel's temperature spec's for our Forum Members and readers through my Temp Guide, and whenever I can, one thread at a time.

The reasons that most readers find processor temperatures so confusing are; (1) not recognizing the vast number of variables in hardware, environments and test methods which influence temperature measurements, and (2) the glaring lack of clarity within Intel's Thermal Specifications, especially the disconnected relationship between Tcase (CPU temperature) and Tj Max (Core temperature).

Most owners don't know that Tcase is CPU temperature, NOT Core temperature, and that there's a 5C difference which Intel doesn't seem to want anyone to know about, apparently because it provides them with an extra 5C thermal cushion for warranty purposes. Most users don't realize that when Core temperature reaches 100C (TjMax) which is "Throttle" temperature, CPU temperature is right behind it at 95C (Tcase)! Since most users monitor Core temperature and not CPU temperature, I think the fashion by which Intel expresses processor temperatures in their spec's is obsolete.

Unfortunately, Intel currently regards these two specifications (Tcase and TjMax) as separate and discrete entities; one for desktop processors (with Integrated Heat Spreader), and the other for mobile processors (without Integrated Heat Spreader) ... which is confusing for the end user, when we know full well that a defined and documented relationship exists.

Further, I think the fact that the 5C difference between Core temperature and CPU temperature can only be found in a few engineering documents, and is not clearly written into a single, understandable specification, is a HUGE failing. Add to this when you chat online with Intel and ask them about the relationship between Tcase and TjMax, their representatives rarely provide a straight forward and informative answer!

The result is that extremely few Intel owners can make heads or tails out of the woefully lacking, vague, ambiguous and confusing Thermal Specifications. I find it amazingly disappointing that a giant corporation who manufactures and markets the best processors in this world doesn't do a better job of writing Thermal Specifications that are clear and understandable, which apply equally well across desktop and mobile platforms.

If I were to rewrite Intel's Thermal Specifications, there would be no reference to Tcase or CPU temperature. The new terminology would reference Core temperatures only.

The spec's for the i7 4790K would be expressed as:

• TcoreMax 79C: The maximum Core temperature allowed at the transistor junctions within the processor.

• Tthrottle 100C: The Core temperature at which the processor will reduce clock speed for thermal protection.

CT :sol:
 

LetsPlayThisBro

Honorable
Mar 14, 2015
377
0
10,810


Well the only time I've seen the CPU hit the high 70's is when I'm running tests made to create heat on the chip. Never in day to day use, which begs the question, just because it can cap at the high 70's does that mean it's not a good overclock, just so long as it's not run in a sustained manner I would think it would be acceptable, not perfect perhaps but acceptable.

I'm getting a new higher airflow case and water cooling solution soon which will make me revisit the overclocking on the chip. In the meantime I will roll back the overclock and just run it at stock until I can figure out why the thermals are such crap in my rig. I'm regretting getting a case with only 2 120mm fan intakes, silent, sure but it lacks proper airflow really, which I'd expect better from Corsair.
 

CompuTronix

Intel Master
Moderator


Since every processor is unique in it's overclocking potential, voltage tolerance and thermal behavior, I think that whatever overclock you can achieve while not exceeding 1.300 Vcore and 80C is acceptable ... it beats running at stock! :D

CT :sol:
 

LetsPlayThisBro

Honorable
Mar 14, 2015
377
0
10,810


True enough but when I first ran my thermal tests it got as high as 81C on a couple of the cores, but only held like that for 20-40 seconds, then it calmed down to a 76-79C, I don't remember the voltage I had it set for but it was a lot less than 1.3, something like 1.25 but didn't push it harder because of the thermals. Which suggests if I can get better cooling in my rig I might be able to push it to 4.8... which would be nice if I can get that stable. But 4.7 is my more realistic hope.
 

LetsPlayThisBro

Honorable
Mar 14, 2015
377
0
10,810


Prime95 26.6v with thermals determined by RealTemp, ran it for about 20 minutes.
 

LetsPlayThisBro

Honorable
Mar 14, 2015
377
0
10,810


Oh but of course. :) I just don't like how close it is to 79C, a little too close for comfort. I'm gonna get the Cooler Master Nepton 280L and stick it in a Phanteks Enthoo EVOLV ATX, presently the Corsair 550D/Noctua NH-U14S is just not cutting it. Particularly the case is a little to silence optimized and not enough airflow optimized.