Does this cpu and gpu max every game at 1080p?
- Thread starter Matthew_c
- Start date
photonboy
Titan
- Jun 20, 2006
- 21,567
- 13
- 85,015
Nope.
First of all, I highly recommend an INTEL setup using an i5-4690K or similar.
As for the video card, I recommend a GTX970 instead. The R9-390 may have 8GB mainly for "future proofing" but the GTX970 has many benefits:
- overclocks higher (stock R9-390 is pretty much maxed)
- DX12_1 vs DX12_0
- PhysX
- MFAA (boosts supported games a bit)
- HUD optimizations
- H.265 (unless that's added to R9-390?)
- HDMI 2 (4K@60Hz)
- voxel lighting support (future games)
- less HEAT output (makes a HUGE difference in small rooms)
First of all, I highly recommend an INTEL setup using an i5-4690K or similar.
As for the video card, I recommend a GTX970 instead. The R9-390 may have 8GB mainly for "future proofing" but the GTX970 has many benefits:
- overclocks higher (stock R9-390 is pretty much maxed)
- DX12_1 vs DX12_0
- PhysX
- MFAA (boosts supported games a bit)
- HUD optimizations
- H.265 (unless that's added to R9-390?)
- HDMI 2 (4K@60Hz)
- voxel lighting support (future games)
- less HEAT output (makes a HUGE difference in small rooms)
photonboy
Titan
- Jun 20, 2006
- 21,567
- 13
- 85,015
No, that's just wrong.
Crysis 3 for example is under 50FPS at not fully maxed settings assuming no CPU bottleneck (which any AMD CPU will do in most games). With a GPU this good it goes over 40% vs a good Intel for some games.
I can find examples with max settings at 1080p with the FX-8350 and R9-390 that are about 30FPS. Not saying MOST GAME aren't good, or any game can't run fine if you drop a few settings but simply saying you can "max every game" is not true.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Powercolor/R9_390_PCS_Plus/14.html
On the CPU side, this is what a CPU bottleneck looks like:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8350-vishera-review,3328-14.html
Older game, but just an example and there's LOTS of games again that you're losing performance by going AMD.
photonboy
Titan
- Jun 20, 2006
- 21,567
- 13
- 85,015
http://www.techspot.com/review/917-far-cry-4-benchmarks/page5.html
There's a better CPU bottleneck example. Basically about 27% higher performance using a newer quad-core INTEL (84FPS vs 66FPS).
"Moreover it is becoming a common occurrence to see an Intel Core i3 processor matching or even beating an AMD FX processor in today's games. As always, gamers are best off with a Core i5 processor as the more expensive Core i7 models offer no real gains."
There's a better CPU bottleneck example. Basically about 27% higher performance using a newer quad-core INTEL (84FPS vs 66FPS).
"Moreover it is becoming a common occurrence to see an Intel Core i3 processor matching or even beating an AMD FX processor in today's games. As always, gamers are best off with a Core i5 processor as the more expensive Core i7 models offer no real gains."
Yeah im thinking of getting an intel i5 4690k with a gtx 970 and also im building this at the end of the month and i might get another gtx 970 for christmas will this be a great gaming machine and what wattage psu do you think i would need for this build (2x 970 sli)
TRENDING THREADS
-
Question New installed W11 on sdd, D drive (HDD) goes to the 100% in seconds
- Started by Emily_Vin
- Replies: 8
-
-
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram