AdamTomasson :
Giroro :
If you can afford to wait around a month, the Radeon R9 nano is most likely going to shake up the ~$400 quite a bit, depending on how it's priced. It's been reported that AMD has already started shipping out their launch supply to retailers.
There's a very good chance its going to offer significantly better performance than a 390x for a similar (~$450) price. The reason that they AMD isn't talking about it even though it could launch in only a few weeks, is because it will hurt (if not destroy) their current cards priced in that range. Which might actually mean they will start at a $500 price until they run through their 390x stock ... but buying it at that price won't make sense with the Fury at $550. Unless you need something small, the card is TINY.
Anyways... if it isn't the card for you, it's still going to force price drops on the 390/390x, which is also likely going to make the 970/980 drop. R9 Nano will hit the market almost immediately after pricing details are given, which is almost certainly going to happen soon. So, I say its a good idea to wait if you can.
I could probably wait 1 or even 2months, but how sure are you/or others that it will be relased that soon? Because i don't really want to wait for to long.
Also will the card "fit" with my motherboard?
Thanks for all the replys.
AMD committed to a summer release when the R9 Nano was announced, but have kept quiet on the specifics for price/performance/release date. As far as I can tell, many places reporting on R9 Nano are expecting an August release but I have not seen where AMD made that claim. Personally, I am expecting a launch within 3 weeks.
R9 Nano is expected to have a TDP of 175 Watts (Around that of a GTX 980, but much lower than an R9 390x). When I say it is tiny, I mean that it has a much shorter length than any other card at the high end. It will be ~6" long instead of the ~11" of an R9 390 and will fit on any motherboard that any of the other cards you are considering will fit.
The problem, is that pinning down the price and by extension it's affect the market is tricky. AMD may decide that people will pay a premium for the shorter length and price it on par with the (almost certainly higher performing) R9 Fury. Logically, the highest performing Fury X is $650, the next step lower Fury is $550, so the next lower performing step at the Nano will be $450. But, AMD already has a card priced at $450 and it may outperform the GTX 980 @$500 (but perform at a level where the extra $50 step to a Fury is a no brainier), hence why it will shake things up. The only way to know for sure is to wait and see.
I think if the R9 Nano wasn't going to come with a price drop to the 390X, then they would have said something by now.