Minimizing memory latency

GameMusic3

Reputable
Nov 25, 2014
61
0
4,630
How do I tell the latency a high speed RAM would have if I underclocked?

Let us say a quick RAM has a listed 10 latency 3000GHZ while a basic RAM has 7 and 1600.

I think from the discussions I read the 3000 can actually support the lowest latency if underclock.
 

Tradesman1

Legenda in Aeternum
Yes in general you can drop the CL at least one for each step down in data rate i.e. if you have say 3000/13 then can drop to 2800/12, 2666/11, 2400/10, 2133/9. 1866/8 1600/7......but you will lose overall performance - each step up from 1600/7 will show a slight performance increase - clear up to 3000
 

GameMusic3

Reputable
Nov 25, 2014
61
0
4,630
So I guess each can support the highest and EVERYTHING UNDER where a 3000/13 underclocked would be equal performance to a 1600/7?

You could buy a strong 3000/13 RAM to get everything, inclusive, under it depending on settings, but it would not be better than a 1600/7 if minimizing latency?

And if I want a low latency over anything else the cheaper RAM is equal?
 

Tradesman1

Legenda in Aeternum
The biggest difference you see with the higher data rates is that you are doing more at once than with the slower Data rates - it will show the most in multi-tasking, memory heavy apps and large data sets (video , rendering, imaging, CAD, GIS, VMs that type of thing)
 

GameMusic3

Reputable
Nov 25, 2014
61
0
4,630
Yes but if I ran an application in which latency is important and frequency is not, in theory, how would I get it the lowest possible?

Would expensive memory using a 3000/13 standard possibly get better latency [1600/6?] than a cheaper memory [1660/7] or are these more equal?

If not would I get any functional advantage if I underclock a premium memory A or use a basic speed one B running at standard?