AIDA64 vs RealTemp Temperature accuracy

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
H

hardhome

Reputable
Jul 17, 2015
27
0
4,530
I've been using AIDA64 and RealTemp to monitor my CPU temps, but for whatever reason the temperature measurements are a bit different. The temperature difference is usually about 5 degrees celsius at any given time with AIDA usually reporting the lower CPU temp. Which one should I trust?

And also is 60degrees maximum CPU, 51degree average temperature bad for 100% load Stress test? I am using i7 4790k with Noctua NH-D14 and Gigabyte G1 gaming GTX 970.
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
KKAW

KKAW

Admirable
Apr 29, 2015
2,226
0
6,960


If you use multiple temperature monitoring tools you may receive incorrect results.

I personally use Aida64 temperatures and they seem to be working out great for me.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
H

hardhome

Reputable
Jul 17, 2015
27
0
4,530


Oops I forgot to mention that, my CPU is not overclocked.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Y

yiukwanho54

Prominent
Oct 7, 2017
18
0
510


so i got a r7 2700x and aida64 showed around 85 degrees in fpu stress test while AMD ryzen master showed around 65-75 degrees , so theres a huge difference and which one should i trust? im getting a little confused
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom