senpaikiller9 :
HEXiT(thank you for your answer) so which one should I go with?
Did AMD fix their driver issue?
And are you sure that I'll be able to play every game on high settings for 3 yrs even with the gtx 970?
its hard to say. gtav pretty much crumples the gtx 970 at max settings with x4 aa as that requires 3.8gig of vram to do.
the r9 390 would have no such issue.
lords of the fallen is the first title ive seen that required 6gig of vram for ultra settings but i cant see it becoming the norm any time soon for most games. as most gamers are 1 card users and the uptake to 1440p+ is pretty slow as the hardware is pretty expencive.
that and the fact the ps4 and xbox seem to be having issues when more than 3gig of vram is being used. so games that are deved on console but are multiplatform will likely run near maxed out for the next few years at least.
pc dev'd titles though may well end up going beyond 4 gigs pretty quickly. so the extra vram on the 390 will give it a lead over the 970.
note* this is speculation on my part based on my past knowledge of game development..
as for amd's driver issues. i was using amd for the last 5 years up until about 6 weeks ago when i replaced my hd 5870 with a gtx 970. in that time i had very little to grumble about as far as driver support went.