Critique My First PC Build

Great Success

Honorable
Mar 24, 2013
53
0
10,660
Decided to build my first computer, used pcpartpicker to find all my components. Main issue here is that I'm not "bottlenecking" myself with any of the parts I selected. Plan is to make a decent gaming/power user rig that will be relevant for a couple years. Here's the part list:

CPU: Intel Core i7-4790K 4.0GHz Quad-Core Processor ($279.99 @ Micro Center)
CPU Cooler: Corsair H110 94.0 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler ($114.99 @ Amazon)
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($121.98 @ Newegg)
Memory: Corsair Vengeance 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($91.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Samsung 850 EVO-Series 500GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($179.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($52.45 @ OutletPC)
Video Card: Gigabyte GeForce GTX 970 4GB WINDFORCE Video Card ($358.85 @ Amazon)
Case: Corsair 500R Black ATX Mid Tower Case ($89.99 @ Amazon)
Power Supply: Corsair CX 600W 80+ Bronze Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply ($44.99 @ Newegg)
Optical Drive: Asus DRW-24B1ST/BLK/B/AS DVD/CD Writer ($15.99 @ Newegg)
Total: $1316.21


Looks good?
 
Solution
For mostly gaming, just another option moving some parts around. Drops from the i7 to the i5, a less expensive but perfectly capable (and likely quieter) cooler for overclocking. A better motherboard (the sli is a real budget board and the gaming 5 has a lot better vrm for overclocking). A better quality higher wattage psu at a better price. Dropping the main ssd from 500gb to 250gb. Upgrading the 970 to a 980ti. Could be even closer in price considering 16gb is overkill for gaming unless you're using a lot of adobe products like photoshop, illustrator etc that gobble up ram, but left the ram the same at 16gb. Vengeance tends to be quite tall and interferes with a number of coolers, the ripjaws was slightly cheaper and it's faster 1866...
For mostly gaming, just another option moving some parts around. Drops from the i7 to the i5, a less expensive but perfectly capable (and likely quieter) cooler for overclocking. A better motherboard (the sli is a real budget board and the gaming 5 has a lot better vrm for overclocking). A better quality higher wattage psu at a better price. Dropping the main ssd from 500gb to 250gb. Upgrading the 970 to a 980ti. Could be even closer in price considering 16gb is overkill for gaming unless you're using a lot of adobe products like photoshop, illustrator etc that gobble up ram, but left the ram the same at 16gb. Vengeance tends to be quite tall and interferes with a number of coolers, the ripjaws was slightly cheaper and it's faster 1866 ram rather than the 1600. The existing build you have would be closer to $1366 since you mentioned no micro center in your state. They don't ship cpu's.

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel Core i5-4690K 3.5GHz Quad-Core Processor ($229.99 @ NCIX US)
CPU Cooler: Thermalright TRUE Spirit 140 POWER 73.6 CFM CPU Cooler ($49.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($129.89 @ OutletPC)
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws X Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR3-1866 Memory ($87.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Samsung 850 EVO-Series 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($99.89 @ OutletPC)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($49.99 @ NCIX US)
Video Card: EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB Video Card ($649.99 @ Amazon)
Case: Corsair 500R Black ATX Mid Tower Case ($89.99 @ Amazon)
Power Supply: EVGA 750W 80+ Bronze Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply ($49.00 @ NCIX US)
Optical Drive: Asus DRW-24B1ST/BLK/B/AS DVD/CD Writer ($18.75 @ OutletPC)
Total: $1455.47
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2015-08-13 13:44 EDT-0400

 
Solution

Great Success

Honorable
Mar 24, 2013
53
0
10,660


Thanks for the input, didn't know my selected motherboard was a budget board. As for the graphics card, that's a big price jump from the 970 to 980 ti. I want to be able to use this rig for the next couple of years, but is the GTX 970 really insufficient? I want 60+ fps on High-Ultra settings @ 1080p. Probably won't be doing 4k gaming for a while.
 
It's not really overkill, it depends on the games you want to play. Even right now, games like witcher 3 if you want ultra graphics at 1080p and be able to hit 60fps a gtx 970 won't cut it. This is 1080p, not 4k and the 970 on ultra gets a min/avg fps of 21fps/43fps. On high, it will do 25/53fps. Now fast forward 3yrs where games are only likely to become more demanding and intense. What if in 3yrs you decide to move to 1440p. Maybe you know you absolutely won't, I don't know myself to be honest. I might easily decide in a year and a half I'd like to play at 1440p. If it's witcher 3, the 970 will be pushing 16/35fps on high, not even ultra. A 980 would push 21/45 on high 1440p and a 980ti is a bit stronger than the 980.

http://www.techspot.com/review/1006-the-witcher-3-benchmarks/page3.html

Have a look at these benchmarks at 1080p and keep in mind this is in current games.
http://www.maximumpc.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti-review/

The bit about 970 is for 1080p, the 980 is for 1440p and 980ti is for 4k can be a bit over simplified which is why repetitive 'solutions' aren't always the way to go. Understandably the 980ti is more expensive than the 970. It will also likely get you through the next 3yrs (maybe longer) enjoying 1080p at or above 60fps on ultra/very high vs 2-3yrs down the line end up playing your new games at low/med just to try and keep the frames up to a playable level. It's completely up to you, if you're more comfortable with a 970 then it's not a bad card at all. If it were me in that situation with the budget for it, I'd opt for the 980ti.

The way I see it, it would take cutting back things like the 500gb ssd to 250gb. An ssd doesn't improve fps during actual game play. A year down the road if you want to install a 500gb ssd it will likely be even cheaper than they are now. If not, you're only out $175 and still have the 250gb ssd. If deciding to stick with the 500gb ssd and going for the 970 at $360 then determine in a couple years it's not enough, you're going to be looking at (provided a similar priced card is offering better performance than existing cards, the 'new' 970 of 2017/2018) spending another $360 on a gpu. Now you've got $720 invested in gpu's. That seems like a pricier component to 'upgrade' later on.

I can't say for sure what will happen in 2-3 years, with the implentation of dx12 (hopefully games start coding for it beyond just a handful) etc. Games are a mixed bag, there are games from 2yrs ago that are more hardware hungry than new games and there are some newer games that will cripple an i7 and 980's in sli. It varies from game to game.