The sandy bridge I had ran at 3.4 GHz, and what I am considering to upgrade to (i7-6000s') will be running at around 3.5Ghz.. So that means it is not much faster unless of course if I overclock it. I did not want to overclock because it feels like it is a lot of work because you have to start and restart the cpu to test it for maximum speed, and it might take a lot of time (and time is not something that I have too much of).
Anyway, just wondering what the community's opinion is about it. I might have to buy the 6700K even though I am not over clocking. I might be spending unnecessary money, but I do want a faster speed upgrade from the sandy bridge. What is everyone's experience about the price depreciation for the 'K' vs. the 'non-K' cpus'? I did manage to still sell my sandy bridge (2600 & non-K) for $150+ 4 years later. Do you think the K will hold a higher value? Or should I just buy the non-K one ( i7-6600) since I don't believe I will over clock.
Lastly, I am wondering, IF my computer crashes and I have to reformat it and reinstall everything. Do I need to re-overclock it? Or, once I overclock the chip, it stays that way, even after I do a reformat of the system.
Thanks,
Anyway, just wondering what the community's opinion is about it. I might have to buy the 6700K even though I am not over clocking. I might be spending unnecessary money, but I do want a faster speed upgrade from the sandy bridge. What is everyone's experience about the price depreciation for the 'K' vs. the 'non-K' cpus'? I did manage to still sell my sandy bridge (2600 & non-K) for $150+ 4 years later. Do you think the K will hold a higher value? Or should I just buy the non-K one ( i7-6600) since I don't believe I will over clock.
Lastly, I am wondering, IF my computer crashes and I have to reformat it and reinstall everything. Do I need to re-overclock it? Or, once I overclock the chip, it stays that way, even after I do a reformat of the system.
Thanks,