High temperatures on Skylake?

AYOTECH320972

Reputable
Sep 6, 2015
2
0
4,510
I recently bought a new Skylake i7-6700k processor and an ASUS Z170 Deluxe board. The only thing I changed in the BIOS was enabling XMP for my memory bumping it up to 3000MHz.

I installed a Noctua NH-D15 cooler. My temps on idle average 20-29C. When I run Prime95, my temps get as high as 85C. This seems high for having a $100 cooler and keeping stock settings. Is everything alright or should I be concerned?
 
Solution
AYOTECH320972,

The proper version is 26.6: http://windows-downloads-center.blogspot.com/2011/04/prime95-266.html

For thermal testing to establish baseline core temperatures, run Small FFT's only. A 10 minute test is sufficient.

Prime95 Small FFT's is the standard for CPU thermal testing, because it's a steady-state 100% workload. This is the test that Real Temp uses to test sensors. Version 26.6, which is well suited to all Core i and Core 2 variants.

Core i 2nd through 6th Generation CPU's have AVX (Advanced Vector Extension) instruction sets. Recent versions of Prime95 such as 28.5 run AVX code on the Floating Point Unit (FPU) math coprocessor, which produces unrealistically high temperatures. The FPU test...
Which version of Prime95 are you using? Newer versions, I think everything after 28.5 puts an unrealistic load on the CPU due to the AVX2 instruction set, leading to insanely high temps regardless of what cooling you use. As such, Prime95 really isn't useful for Haswell and later Intel CPUs. You might want to stress test with something else like OCCT, Intel Burn Test or Aida64 and see what your temps are like.
 

AYOTECH320972

Reputable
Sep 6, 2015
2
0
4,510


I'm using the latest version from the website. I did not know that, I'll have to figure out which version doesnt support AVX2 and try that and report back.
 

CompuTronix

Intel Master
Moderator
AYOTECH320972,

The proper version is 26.6: http://windows-downloads-center.blogspot.com/2011/04/prime95-266.html

For thermal testing to establish baseline core temperatures, run Small FFT's only. A 10 minute test is sufficient.

Prime95 Small FFT's is the standard for CPU thermal testing, because it's a steady-state 100% workload. This is the test that Real Temp uses to test sensors. Version 26.6, which is well suited to all Core i and Core 2 variants.

Core i 2nd through 6th Generation CPU's have AVX (Advanced Vector Extension) instruction sets. Recent versions of Prime95 such as 28.5 run AVX code on the Floating Point Unit (FPU) math coprocessor, which produces unrealistically high temperatures. The FPU test in the utility AIDA64 shows similar results.

Prime95 v26.6 produces temperatures on 3rd through 6th Generation processors more consistent with 2nd Generation, which also have AVX instructions, but do not suffer from thermal extremes due to having a soldered Integrated Heat Spreader and a significantly larger Die.

Note: If you overclock and run applications which use AVX, you may need to reduce Vcore and clock speed and / or upgrade your cooling so that Core temperatures don’t exceed 80C.

Prime95's default test, Blend, is a cyclic workload for testing memory stability, and Large FFT's combines CPU and memory tests. As such, Blend and Large FFT's both have cyclic workloads which aren’t suitable for CPU thermal testing.

Other stability tests such as Linpack and Intel Burn Test have cycles that peak at 110% workload, which again aren’t suitable for CPU thermal testing. The test utility OCCT runs elements of Linpack and Prime95, but will terminate the CPU tests at 85C.

The "Charts" in SpeedFan span 13 minutes, and show how each test creates different thermal signatures.

Shown above from left to right: Small FFT's, Blend, Linpack and Intel Burn Test.

Note the steady-state thermal signatures of Small FFT's, which allows accurate measurements of Core temperatures.

Shown above from left to right: Small FFT's, Intel Extreme Tuning Utility CPU Test, and AIDA64 CPU Test.

Intel Extreme Tuning Utility is also a cyclic workload. Although AIDA64's CPU test is steady-state, the workload is well below Thermal Design Power (TDP), which is insufficient.

If you'd like to get yourself up to speed on this topic, you might want to give this a read:

Intel Temperature Guide - http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-1800828/intel-temperature-guide.html

CT :sol:
 
Solution