AMD FX 8350 vs i5 4590

geogamer13

Reputable
Mar 8, 2015
61
0
4,630
Which one should i buy? I do a video editing and gaming
rig:
R9 390 8GB
8GB RAM
Bitfenix Prodigy M
Bitfenix Fury 750w Gold Rated PSU

And which one do you recommend r9 390 8gb or gtx 970 4gb (3.5gb + 512mb)

 
Solution
If we put the GPU issue aside:
For pure gaming rig, i5 4590 is way better than FX8350/FX8320 and it consumes a lot less power.
For pure budget editing rig, FX8350 or even FX8320 is way better, since you will need those extra cores or threads.
FX8350 and FX8320 are also overclock-able, which could be helpful to keep up to i5 4590 in games but with the cost of more power consumption. (edit: forget those FX9xxx, they are b*llsh*t)
i5 4590 and i5 4460 are not that difference except on benchmarks, you are free to pick i5 4460, if you like.

If we put the processor issue aside,
GTX970 and R9 390 are quite similar in performance with their own pros and cons.
GTX970 is cooler, consumes a less power, is better overclockable and similar fast to...
Dont base any hardware decision today on what Might happen with DX12. There are no reliable benchmarks yet and wont be until its fully supported and there are multiple games out supporting. I strongly recommend reviewing current benchmarks and basing a decision on that, what happens with future software such as DX12 is still speculation and not something to base a hardware decision on
 

jollypirate

Honorable
Jul 18, 2014
1,164
0
11,660


the 390 beats the 970 in dx11 too
 
If we put the GPU issue aside:
For pure gaming rig, i5 4590 is way better than FX8350/FX8320 and it consumes a lot less power.
For pure budget editing rig, FX8350 or even FX8320 is way better, since you will need those extra cores or threads.
FX8350 and FX8320 are also overclock-able, which could be helpful to keep up to i5 4590 in games but with the cost of more power consumption. (edit: forget those FX9xxx, they are b*llsh*t)
i5 4590 and i5 4460 are not that difference except on benchmarks, you are free to pick i5 4460, if you like.

If we put the processor issue aside,
GTX970 and R9 390 are quite similar in performance with their own pros and cons.
GTX970 is cooler, consumes a less power, is better overclockable and similar fast to R9 390 as long as you do not exceed the 3.5GB VRAM limit. GTX970 will be sh*t slow if you go above 3.5GB.
R9 390 consumes more power, is cheaper, is not that good overclockable and has a lot more RAM.
Both GTX970 and R9 390 are moving in the same performance class. Any will serve you well.
I would not bother DX12 at the moment, by the time DX12 became mainstream, the next gen GPUs are already available.
More VRAM could be helpful for rendering/editing but do check if your rendering/editing program prefers CUDA (nVidia) or OpenCL(AMD/ATI).

Now to get the best of your money,
1. Choosing the processor:
Gaming or most games tend to rely more on the GPU than processor.
Most games tend to prefer faster cores (i5/i7/Xeon E3) over more but slower cores (FX).
Editing and rendering could gain benefits on more cores.
Which one do you do more, editing or gaming? more gaming == i5, more editing == FX8xxx
Alternative:
If I say you can get E3-1231V3, which is for normal users an i7 4790 without the iGPU and has the price of an i5 4690k, what would you say? It is the better choice but you must pay quite a lot more compared to i5 4590.
2. Choosing the GPU:
R9 390, R9 390X, Fury X, GTX970 and GTX980Ti are the best buys in my opinion. You do nothing wrong picking any of them, just adjust to your budget and match the CUDA/OpenCL to your rendering/editing software.
Yes, no GTX980 above, this card is not a good buy, it is only 5% faster than GTX970 with extra 0.5GB VRAM but costs quite a lot more.
 
Solution
1) i5-4590 hands down.

2) GPU?
That's a tough choice. Let's be clear:
a) R9-390 and GTX970 are very similar: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Powercolor/R9_390_PCS_Plus/30.html

The R9-390 only wins on average noticeably at unreasonable 4K settings. The GTX970 also OVERCLOCKS better so it wins.

Close enough to call raw performance about EQUAL though.

b) More than 3.5GB is rarely an issue now. How much in the future is not clear. Yes, I'm sure it will be an issue but for how many games? Not clear. Probably not a big deal OVERALL.

c) Performance is only part of the total package. Ask yourself what features are offered you may want (i.e. for NVidia you have PhysX, GSYNC, probably better HUD support, better DX11 drivers, and finally there's the question of AMD's financial commitment in the future to keep driver updates timely).

NVidia Shadowplay works really well (I even recorded 2560x1440@60FPS and it looked great and FPS drop was about 5%.. not noticeable using VSYNC though but I turned VSYNC OFF just to run a few benchmarks.)

Pros and cons, but I tend to lean towards the GTX970 + i5-4590 (980Ti I'm guessing is out of budget).