Upgrading from HDD to SSD to my system KINGSTON VS SANDISK(I know SAMSUNG is better, but can not afford it now)

I just want to know if there are any issues with any of them: Kingstone V300, and Sandisk
and wich is better, cause bough has the same prize in my country.
I can only afford 128GB (65cuc),the Samsung EVO 128GB is (90-110cuc).
So my question is will I get any issues if I get the V300 or Sandisk?, cause if there are issues Id prefer waiting in order to get an EVO(and believeme its been a lot of time waiting to prices to drop).
I know everybody will recommend me 256GB minimun, but I can not afford it.
 
I have a 120GB intel M.2 as my boot drive. I keep only FF14 on there for games, everything else gets installed on the spinning drive. You can make it work I have 70 gigs free atm, But you have to keep the drive clean so to speak, with disk cleanup etc.

(edit) I would hold out for the Samsung, I had a Sandisk crap out after 6 months, anecdotal evidence I know but I figure you get what you pay for.
 


Ok, thanks in advance, could you be more specific about that term(crap out), Im curious, and what do you think about V300 from Kingstone?
.

 


I installed an old Kingston SSD in my system in order to test it from a friend of me, I cant remenber it it was aV100 or V200, but I got really shock with its performance(booting in just 6-7seconds), I am just imaging what that V300 can do for me compared to my mecanical HDD.

 


It vanished from the bios, controller failure I assumed as I tried in in another machine to no avail. I have a cheap samsung 840 which was purchased to replace and it's still going strong. Like I said anecdotal, one case does not mean they are all bad.
 


ohh, thats is why I must be really sure before purchase a SSD, cause once I get it, my garantee will be only 7-15days, here we dont have store garantee.
So I have to go for sure(EVO is just comming to my mind despite the price).