Looking for advice/feedback on new (reasonably priced) gaming build that will last awhile

keesio

Honorable
Jan 28, 2013
51
0
10,640
Hello folks,
I've got an old rig that originally built 7+ years ago. The heart of it is a Q6600 running at stock and an ASUS P5Q mobo. I've updated RAM and graphics numerous times over the years to where it 8GB DDR2 and a Nvidia GTX560ti 1GB. It has performed admirably up until now, aided by the fact that I have a pretty low rez monitor - 1680x1050. But after looking at the specs needed to run Fallout 4, it looks like it is the end of the line for my current rig. I'm looking to upgrade, basically build a whole new rig that can last another 7 years. I'm torn with going all out or just being reasonable (but still with a long outlook). Before i get to my proposed build, here are some details as suggested from the build advice template:


Approximate Purchase Date: before Fallout 4 comes out (November 10th 2015)

Budget Range: $800 - $1200 USD (ideally). I can go higher if given a compelling reason.

System Usage from Most to Least Important: Games, web surfing, media center (play movies, music, etc), video transcoding

Are you buying a monitor: NO

Parts to Upgrade: CPU, MOBO, RAM, Graphics Card, SSD

Do you need to buy OS: YES (but I have a separate budget for that)

Preferred Website(s) for Parts: NCIX.com

Location: City, State/Region, Country - Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Overclocking: NO

SLI or Crossfire: NO

Your Monitor Resolution: 1680x1050 and 1280x1024 (dual display). However I will only use 1680x1050 for gaming. I'm happy with my monitor setup (no real burning desire to go higher)

Additional Comments: it is not a priority that I play every game on High/Ultra graphics with all settings maxed out. I am just looking for an enjoyable gaming experience with good frame rates. I have no problems playing games on "medium" settings.

And Most Importantly, Why Are You Upgrading: Mentioned in initial comment


So here is what I am eyeing and I can really use your feedback:

CPU: i5-4460 (or i5-4590). I've been going back and forth between an i7 and and i5. I know the benefits for an i7 is minimal for gaming right now. But what about down the road? But at the same time I don't want to pay for something now that I won't really use to it's full capacity. I do some video transcoding which I know than an i7 (HT) will help, but I don't really do it that much and I figure I can just run some batch jobs overnight so its not like time is critical. So really I am considering an i7 for "future-proof" reasons and I think that is not a good enough reason. Thoughts?

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS. I love ASUS mobos so that is why I am going with ASUS here. My confusion is if I should go with an H97 or Z97. I figure since I have no plans to overclock or SLI/Crossfire, there is no point to get a "Z" class, right?. I also have one PCI and one PCIe card I will reuse in my new rig so I need a mobo with each.

Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws X Series 16GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR3-1600. Not much debate here. I'll get 16 GB. I'm indifferent to the brand and long as it is a decent brand

Storage: Crucial MX200 500GB SSD. Not much debate here either. I have a Crucial 256 SSD in my current rig and like it. Just need more space.

Video Card: Asus GeForce GTX 960 4GB. Ok, I am struggling here with this choice. I wish the GTX 980/970 was cheaper but right now the prices are a bit too high for me to swallow. I figure since I run a 1680x1050, I don't need a killer card to run at high settings. But I keep reading how the GTX 960 is a disappointing GPU. I considered a Radeon A9 380, which is a similar price for better performance but I don't like AMD/ATI for personal reasons. I also use a dual display outside gaming and I hear the AMD GPUs do not clock down to idle properly in those cases and there is no "Nvidia Inspector" tool that I use to control that like I can for Nvidia GPUs. But it any case, am I selling myself short here with the GTX 960? Should I just bit the bullet and spend another $150 (Canadian) and get a GTX 970 because of the VFM (value for money) and so I can be more "future-proof" in case I get a better monitor? Or is really a GTX 960 all I'll ever need for 1080p in the years to come?

Case: Corsair 100R ATX Mid-tower. I just want a decent ATX case that is not too huge. I don't need like 8 drive bays. This case looks solid.

That is mostly what I plan on buying. I will reuse my Antec 750W power supply, Sound Blaster Z, and Hitachi Deskstar 2TB HDD from my existing rig, and will use my two existing 1680x1050 and 1280x1024 LCDs along with my keyboard and mouse.

The above will take me to at least ~800 USD. If I go premium on the CPU (i7-4790) and GPU (Nvidia GTX 970), that will add another $250+ USD. I know 250 USD doesn't sound like a killer but I live in Canada and with our sinking dollar compared to the US, it has made everything in general more costly.

I'd love to be able to milk this new rig for as long as I did my existing one. Will my original $800 USD build make it or do I need the additional upgrades?

Thanks a bunch!
 
Solution
CPU:

An i7 would probably be better for longevity much like a Q6600 was back when you bought it, I remember it fondly as people were all about the E8400 and overclocking yet the Q6600 lasted longer due to more cores in the end. But games right now do not pull more than 4 cores if that so an i5 is still a good CPU for gaming.

Motherboard:

I also love Asus. Have been using them for all of my builds since I have started and never had an issue. That said, if you do not plan to overclock then no a Z is not necessary. They are very similar.

Storage:

I prefer Samsung or Intel over Crucial and the 8509 Evo series is a great part for not that much more but that is all choice.

Memory:

I mainly do Corsair but G.Skill is decent too.

Case...
CPU:

An i7 would probably be better for longevity much like a Q6600 was back when you bought it, I remember it fondly as people were all about the E8400 and overclocking yet the Q6600 lasted longer due to more cores in the end. But games right now do not pull more than 4 cores if that so an i5 is still a good CPU for gaming.

Motherboard:

I also love Asus. Have been using them for all of my builds since I have started and never had an issue. That said, if you do not plan to overclock then no a Z is not necessary. They are very similar.

Storage:

I prefer Samsung or Intel over Crucial and the 8509 Evo series is a great part for not that much more but that is all choice.

Memory:

I mainly do Corsair but G.Skill is decent too.

Case:

It is a decent case but I would personally go higher. I would probably do the 230T from Corsair. Not much bigger but a bit better for air flow.

http://pcpartpicker.com/p/bF36Hx

That is a build sort of around what you started but with a newer CPU (Skylake instead of Haswell) and well within your budget. It also has a GTX 970 which would do better than a GTX 960 for quite a while.

Hell I could do another build with a bit better case if anything since there is still $100 bucks between your top end budget.
 
Solution

keesio

Honorable
Jan 28, 2013
51
0
10,640


That's a great point. I remember 7 years ago going through the same decision - Core2 Quad or Core 2 Duo? And I went Quad thinking it would pay off down the road. And it did. I think I'm putting the i7 back on the table!

And yeah, the GTX 970 should last awhile... I should pay up for that...
 
In the link I provided that build is $1100 if you buy from the places it lists and includes the GTX 970. I would assume that eventually you might upgrade to a 1080P monitor (they are pretty cheap) and a GTX 970 would be better for that in the long run which would save you from having to upgrade GPUs again for a bit longer than a GTX 960. The GTX 960 is not a bad GPU but it is more a mid end GPU. Can normally push medium to high settings at 1080p in most games but a GTX 970 can push high in more games.
 

keesio

Honorable
Jan 28, 2013
51
0
10,640
Thanks man, I'm going with the 970.

I've tweaked my build to:
http://pcpartpicker.com/user/keesio/saved/#view=9vZypg

While I love ASUS, I'm thinking of going with the Gigabyte H97 D3H only because it has a one PCI and one PCIe at the bottom of the board, away from the slot where I'd stick my graphics card. I like that since I have one PCI card and one PCIe card I'd like to take from my old rig and stick it in my new rig but away from my GPU for cooling purposes. The ASUS H97-PLUS has two PCI slots near the bottom but no PCIe slot a good distance away from where the graphics card would go. Does that make sense?
 
What matters is that it works for you. I have not used a PCI slot since my SoundBlaster X-Fi so I tend to not think of them anymore but if that fits your needs then it should work out great. I would see if you can go for the Vengeance Pro RAM, a bit better than the Vengeance and typically the same cost for the same speed.
 

keesio

Honorable
Jan 28, 2013
51
0
10,640
Yeah maybe i'm being silly basing my mobo decision on where the PCI and PCIe slots are located. One is a PCI TV tuner card from Hauppauge and the PCIe is my Soundblaster Z. Both have a lot of life in them though.

I'll see about that Vengeance Pro upgrade. thanks!
 
5 years, maybe. It is truly hard to say but the GTX 970 is a great 1080P GPU. DX12 might help extend its life since it should help reduce overhead from the API, driver and CPU and help utilize more of the GPUs potential.

I would say yes but again it is truly hard to say. Then again my old HD7970GHz was fine for 1080P after 4 years and still goes pretty strong as the R9 280X at most games at 1080P, just not max everything settings in a few.
 

keesio

Honorable
Jan 28, 2013
51
0
10,640
I'm good with not having to max everything out when I play. As long as I can get most settings at "medium-high" to "high", I'm happy.

I do entertain thoughts of possibly going to 1440p in the future. i was hoping a 970 can handle 1440p respectably for a long while too but maybe that is wishful thinking.
 
1440P would be a bit of a stretch. Right now 1440P is pretty much a GTX 980/980Ti (more a Ti) or a Fury/Fury X (again more a Fury X). Nothing can do 4K at 60FPS so for a lot of people 4K is still not "viable".

I would say a 970 could probably do medium to high 1440P but newer games in the next few years might push that.