Possible CPU Bottleneck

Javantae

Reputable
Oct 24, 2015
5
0
4,510
Specs
OS: Windows 10 Pro
CPU:AMD FX-8150 @ Stock 3.6GHz
GPU:AMD R9 290
RAM:8GB
MOBO:asus sabertooth 990fx r2.0

I mainly play mmos so just wondering if i need something better....
 
Solution
As far as MMOs go, Guild Wars 2 is actually pretty well optimized for multicore CPUs. But the render pipe is still bound by a single thread. And The 8150 is worse than the 8320 or 8350 in per core performance.

The 8150 will OC quite well, but still be a little slower then the 63xx or 83xx series.

You could get by with an FX 6300 or 6350, good cooling and a good OC. Would be a good compromise to improve performance without spending a lot on a new Intel Board, CPU and RAM. But in the end, an Intel setup is generally going to be about 5-10 FPS faster overall in GW2.

Here's a reference example from a recent build I did for a friend. FX 6350 OCd to 4.6 GHz and an R9 280.
Note: This is performance while recording with MSI...


Yes, for example, Battlefield isn't affected by this as the game is designed to use up to 8 processing cores whereas World of Warcraft only uses 3. So it really comes down to the game, but today, most games, including MMO only uses 3-4 cores where it could indeed bottleneck the graphics card.
 

Javantae

Reputable
Oct 24, 2015
5
0
4,510

well right now I'm playing blade and soul Taiwan in the beginning area my fps was fine it was around 70-110+ at all times but now when I'm in the open world it's around 30-60 very rarely will it go up past 65+ even with no one is around me. I've tried messing with the in-game settings didn't see any improvements even when i turned the settings all the way down. I also tried catalyst control center and I didn't notice any visual / graphical performance, and I even turned Tessellation on x64 just to see if it gave me horrible lag which it didn't.
 
As far as MMOs go, Guild Wars 2 is actually pretty well optimized for multicore CPUs. But the render pipe is still bound by a single thread. And The 8150 is worse than the 8320 or 8350 in per core performance.

The 8150 will OC quite well, but still be a little slower then the 63xx or 83xx series.

You could get by with an FX 6300 or 6350, good cooling and a good OC. Would be a good compromise to improve performance without spending a lot on a new Intel Board, CPU and RAM. But in the end, an Intel setup is generally going to be about 5-10 FPS faster overall in GW2.

Here's a reference example from a recent build I did for a friend. FX 6350 OCd to 4.6 GHz and an R9 280.
Note: This is performance while recording with MSI Afterburner. It's better while just playing.

[video="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5M0AAdaArIo"][/video]

 
Solution

fatboytyler

Distinguished
Jan 29, 2012
590
0
19,160


This may be true now. I haven't tested it in a while, but back in the Cataclysm days and prior this was not the case.

I would still imagine that 3 cores on the 8150 wouldn't be a bottleneck though would it? Sure its not an i5 or 8350, but its not that bad is it?
 


So the reason I know this about World of Warcraft is because I had the same problem. I used to LOVE AMD and would buy their processors for everything. I had the 8150, loved it, but in WoW I was getting lower than expected FPS. I overclocked my chip as high as possible and this did provide a nice jump in FPS but it wasn't what I was hoping for being an enthusiasts at the time. So, I bought an i7-3770K (with HT disabled) and my FPS nearly doubled in some scenarioes