I'm not seeing 60% ... at least that you can buy. Newegg lists (70) Z170 MoBos
Asus = 20 or about 28%
ASRock = 16
Gigglebyte = 15
MSI = 14
EVGA = 3
SM = 2
It's still too hard to say and I have been telling everyone if you must have it now, do Z97. looking for recent tests, I was real anxious to see what the gorgeous MSI Z170 Titanium would deliver and its a mixed bag.
http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/cpu_mainboard/msi_z170_xpower_titanium_review/11
Just from a quick glance, it seems to have an edge on the 4 Unigine Benchmarks but is in turn edged in the gaming benchies. Unlike the above example, we are not seeing the 7, 12 and 30% differences, they are less than 1%
Unigine Benchies
MSI Z170A XPower Itanium - 100.00%
Asus Z170-A - 99.35%
Asus Maximus VIII Gene - 99.44%
Asus Maximus VIII Hero - 99.35%
Gaming Benchies (Tomb Raider, Sleeping Dogs, Hitman Absol.)
Asus Maximus VIII Gene - 100.00%
Asus Maximus VIII Hero - 98.87%
Asus Z170-A - 98.74%
MSI Z170A XPower Itanium - 97.83%
On the gaming, we are looking at just over 2% difference between 1st and last whereas before, we were talking 7% or more for most boards. In Uningine numbers, we are talking less than 1%. Before (Z97) the synthetic benchies resulted in similar placements .... here they reverse. So it's a bit harder to come to conclusions because:
a) Smaller number of boards in sample
b) Differences are very small, perhaps within test margin of error or normal variation between pieces of silicon
c) The two tests come to different conclusions
I should note that in past years or better said past generations, the results we more typical to what we see on the Z170s. I think it wasn't so much with Z97's that MSI hit a home run with the MSI Z97 Gaming 9, Gaming 5 and Gaming 6 but that Asus dropped a couple of turds with the Hero, Formula, Gene and Z97-A
I had similar experiences with Asus of late ....after shipping back a WS board Halloween, did not receive a working board till well into January. The 1st one they shipped as shaped like a banana, reminded me of some older Asrock boards I had seen years back. The I/O panel missed fitting in the case opening by 3/4 of an inch. The interesting part was ... Asus spun off Asrock so they could compete in the low budget / builder market and here all the communications I rec'd regarding "Where the hell is my board for 3 months ?" came from Pegatron, Asrock's parent company. I had numerous issues with Z87 Formula and Hero boards, well not so much multiple issues but same issues on multiple boards. The external drives not waking from sleep was solved by a new stepping but the promised BIOS upgrade for the BIOS clock freeze bug never materialized.
Still, I am by no means shy about considering an Asus Z170 board if the web site reviews, newegg user reviews and other resources show favorable results. I have seen nothing yet either way however indicating if the TS / RMA process has improved. Seems everyone out there is trying for a last place finish here.
I just might buy an XPower Titanium to leave on my desk and stare at it
.... I hope other MoBo vendors follow suite with the coating process ... as well as RAM, GFX cards also
http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/cpu_mainboard/msi_z170_xpower_titanium_review/2
Here it is then. In photographs we admit it looks like someone took a can of silver spray and went to town. In the flesh though it is, if you like that sort of thing, gorgeous. We often mention how photographs don't do justice to the looks of something when it is in front of you and the Titanium stretches this point to near breaking point. The benefits of having an all-silver board are obvious when you put a graphics card into it. Because it's so neutral it works beautifully with any colour at all.
Another things I'd like to see more widely incorporated are:
"Steel Armor" - the PCI slots are reinforced to prevent GFX card weigt from yanking them off the board ... just had a user bring his back as his PC, well his MoBo, didn't survive a 10 mile move on the back seat of his car ... yes he used a seat belt
.... but I guess a pot hole bounce did him in.
"OC Tools" - the separate board is a great idea and the dial, at least from the various reviews I have read, looks like the 1st OC tool that I'd let users walk out the door with and tell them to OC at home.
However, in it's current configuration, manually overclocking the board has proven diffucult to some.... not so much the board's capabilities as the power circuitry is outstanding, but the BIOSs load line calibration table has been reported as a bit off. Luckily this can easily be fixed with a BIOS upgrade which, again, is a reason to hold off on Z170. I expect some are better than others here (Asus has always done well here) but at this a point in time, it's just going to get better with later steppings and newer BIOSs across all vendor offerings.
Note however that many Z97 boards are already disappearing. If ya gonna go that way, no reason to hold off and soon the more popular models may no longer be available. From thanksgiving to XMas, there'll be a time when it's a tossup between Z97 and Z170. After Xmas, Z97 will be stuck with the "last generation" moniker and have greatly reduced perceived value.