390 vs 290X for my needs?

Pask

Honorable
Dec 3, 2013
26
0
10,530
390 vs 290x for my needs?

I'll say straight off that I'm not a gamer. I'm an editor who very occasionally plays a game like Tomb Raider or COD MW2. Nothing heavy.
I'm using Sony Vegas Pro 13
Here's my rig:
17 4790 (non-K, so not OC'd)
GTX 650 Ti boost SC
32GB RAM
620W Seasonic S1211 PSU
2 SSD's
4 HDD's
Design R4 case + 4 case fans

I'm looking at these two cards for several reasons:
1) I want to go AMD because Vegas is far better optimized for Open CL \ GL than CUDA.
2) I'm in Canada and these are about the same price and fall within my budget. My ideal budget is $480 CAD, but I'll stretch that to $500 CAD.
Two examples:
Sapphire Tri-X R9 290x is $429 - after taxes (13%) and shipping that comes to $498 (we get slaughtered w tax)
http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202089&cm_re=R9_290x-_-14-202-089-_-Product

Sapphire Nitro R9 390 - backplate version is $439 -with t+s it's $503
http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202164&cm_re=R9_390-_-14-202-164-_-Product

More important then Clock speed and VRAM for me as an editor are the GFLOPS and Compute Units for Open CL optimization in Vegas
The 290x has 5632 GFLOPS; the 390 has 5120.
290x has 44 compute units; the 390 has 40.
Both use 2.0 Open CL; the 390 has a slight advantage in Open GL using v 4.5 rather than the 290x's 4.4 - not a huge deal

Other considerations ...

The only retail 290x I can currently find in Canada is the Sapphire one linked above, from Newegg. (unless I go used from eBay) I see some complaints about that 290X's drivers, heat & noise. I have a Design R4 case so the noise is probably not an issue with a sound dampened case.
Both card lengths are no prob in the Design R4

Also I currently have only the above mentioned 620W Seasonic S1211 PSU. That's one of my biggest concerns. I know that here the most common answer is that both cards could run on that 620W PSU - it has plenty on the 12V rail. But again I'm reading some issues about 600 - 650W PSU's for both cards from customer reviews. Some saying that they ran better upping to at least a 750 or 800w
The reference 390 shows a 275W TDP, but the Sapphire 390 linked above shows 375W from specs at Sapphire
http://www.sapphiretech.com/productdetial.asp?pid=FF539E23-7718-4BDE-9E02-CF174D2BFCC2&lang=eng
The 290x shows < 300W frm the Sapphire specs
http://www.sapphiretech.com/productdetial.asp?pid=640A98CD-0CF0-4191-B75C-CA2800111ADB&lang=eng

I have an i7 4790 non-K, so not OC'd ,and I would not be interested in OC'ing the card. I'm wondering if I underclocked it would it reduce the power draw? Would that be necessary? At least until I could afford a new PSU some time in the new year.

So when I look at these two, the advantage for editing goes to the 290X. It's the older card and I'm wondering what advantages I might see with the 390 that I could b e overlooking? The 390x is currently way over my budget. Current pricing for 390X's in Canada after t+s bring them to around $600. $100 over my budget.

Any thoughts? Input? Especially regarding my PSU, and any advantages of the newer vs older card

Thanks

Edit:
I also want to say that stability is important. I'm looking for the best out of box experience without having to do a lot of tweaking. Just simple ease of use is important.
 
Solution
I'd go with the 390. The extra video ram will help when you're working on large files, it's a good amount faster, and it's more future proof. The sapphire 290 you are referring to is reference design, which you don't want. Reference has poor cooling and a loud fan. Getting a non-reference 290 will cost almost as much as a 390.

Another option, not much more expensive than the 390 is the 390x, which is even faster.
I'd go with the 390. The extra video ram will help when you're working on large files, it's a good amount faster, and it's more future proof. The sapphire 290 you are referring to is reference design, which you don't want. Reference has poor cooling and a loud fan. Getting a non-reference 290 will cost almost as much as a 390.

Another option, not much more expensive than the 390 is the 390x, which is even faster.
 
Solution