- Sep 13, 2015
- 11
- 0
- 4,510
I am no gamer, and use the computer for coding, running Media Server, etc.
I have built an over-kill PC with i7 6600k Skylake CPU, 16GB DDR4, Gigabyte G1 Gaming 5 motherboard. I was planning on using the graphics in the Intel CPU, but since I have put close to $1200 into this, I am wondering if a dedicated graphics card would be of any use to me. Is there a sub $200 card that would be WAY better than Intel 530 that is baked into CPU? I run two monitors that will eventually be 4k WAY down the road when current 1080 monitors go out.
I build a new PC about every 5 years but I guess I could add a dedicated card down the road. Any opinions on why I should or should not use dedicated card, and if so, what card would be much better the CPU graphics at the ~$200 range.
I have built an over-kill PC with i7 6600k Skylake CPU, 16GB DDR4, Gigabyte G1 Gaming 5 motherboard. I was planning on using the graphics in the Intel CPU, but since I have put close to $1200 into this, I am wondering if a dedicated graphics card would be of any use to me. Is there a sub $200 card that would be WAY better than Intel 530 that is baked into CPU? I run two monitors that will eventually be 4k WAY down the road when current 1080 monitors go out.
I build a new PC about every 5 years but I guess I could add a dedicated card down the road. Any opinions on why I should or should not use dedicated card, and if so, what card would be much better the CPU graphics at the ~$200 range.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram