comparing Dell 960 Quad and Dell Precision T1500 i3

jbclem

Distinguished
Sep 20, 2009
51
0
18,530
I am choosing between two used computers. The Dell 960 Quad 2.66 mHz uses DDR2 ram. The Dell Precision T1500 i3 540 uses DDR3 ram and is a 3.06 mHz dual core. Both have 4 gb ram.

I already have one Dell 960 Quad 2.66 and I've found that for what I do (lots of internet, many tabs open at once) the quad core doesn't seem to be very involved. From what I know, quad cores are only a benefit when you have software that's designed for multiple cores. Besides the internet, I have live data stock market programs running. I use Windows XP.

I'd guess that the T1500 is the faster one, but I'd like some opinions about this. I've also read that the Dell 960 is better made and has more space inside the case. I like my Dell 960 but wouldn't mind a quicker computer.

Any opinions?

John
 
Solution


John,

I assume the Dell 960 is an Optiplex. In the Dell hierarchy, the Precision line is the top, workstations made for the highest level of reliability in continuous, full performance operation. They have healthy power supplies, for example the T7500 is 1100W. I currently have Precision 390, T3500, T5400, and T5500, all of which I bought used and upgraded and all of these have been 100% reliable- and heavy.

That said, the T1500 was not the high point, but does use DDR3 RAM and a more modern CPU architecture, of the two systems mentioned.

Passmark Performance Test baseline results (161 tested):

1. The Top Rated Optiplex 960 2.66GHz CPU:

Rating___1620
CPU ____3554 (Q9400)
2D ______ 545 (GTX 650)
3D______1862
Mem ____ 835 (6GB)
Disk_____ 755 (WD 160GB)

For general use these are quite good scores. An SSD would liven things up- a 960 with a Samsung 840 Evo 250GB has a disk score of 2600 and a GTX 750 Ti produced a 3D of 3829 and of course there are faster CPU's in that chassis, so the potential is there. That is however already changing all the parts that can changed and it's not the system under consideration.

Surprisingly:

2. The Top Rated Precision T1500 / i3 540 3.06GHz:

Rating___ 764
CPU ____ 3008
2D ______ 491 (Firepro 2260)
3D______ 122
Mem ___ 1138 (4GB)
Disk_____ 511 ("ARRAY")

The sample is very small- only 71500's with i3, and 6 are i3-540 2.93GHz. Overall poor performance, though again changing everything will always make a difference:

3. The Top Scores for Precision T1500 in each parameter;

Rating___ 2815
CPU ____ 5952 (i7-880)
2D ______ 631 (430 GT)
3D______ 5625 (GTX960 !)
Mem ___ 1908 (8GB)
Disk_____ 2713 (Samsung 840 Pro)

4. The Top Scores for Optiplex 960 in each parameter;

Rating___ 2289 (Q9650 / GTX 650 /Samsung 840 Evo)
CPU ____ 8535 (i7-2600)
2D ______ 713 (Radeon HD 4550)
3D______ 6262 (GTX960 !)
Mem ___ 2109 (8GB)
Disk_____ 2726 (Intel SCM2H120)

So,especially if you're not planning or inclined to upgrade substantially, the Optiplex is the better choice.

Surprised me!

Cheers,

BambiBoom


1. HP z420 (2015) > Xeon E5-1660 v2 (6-core @ 3.7 / 4.0GHz) > 32GB DDR3 1866 ECC RAM > Quadro K4200 (4GB) > Intel 730 480GB (9SSDSC2BP480G4R5) > Western Digital Black WD1003FZEX 1TB> M-Audio 192 sound card > 600W PSU> > Windows 7 Professional 64-bit > Logitech z2300 speakers > 2X Dell Ultrasharp U2715H (2560 X 1440)>
[ Passmark Rating = 5064 > CPU= 13989 / 2D= 819 / 3D= 4596 / Mem= 2772 / Disk= 4555] [Cinebench R15 > CPU = 1014 OpenGL= 126.59 FPS] 7.8.15

2. Dell Precision T5500 (2011) > 2X Xeon X5680 (6 -core @ 3.33 / 3.6GHz), 48GB DDR3 1333 ECC Reg. > Quadro K2200 (4GB ) > PERC H310 / Samsung 840 250GB / WD RE4 Enterprise 1TB > M-Audio 192 sound card > 875W PSU > Windows 7 Professional 64> HP 2711x (27", 1920 X 1080)
[ Passmark system rating = 3844 / CPU = 15047 / 2D= 662 / 3D= 3500 / Mem= 1785 / Disk= 2649] (12.30.15)














 
Solution

jbclem

Distinguished
Sep 20, 2009
51
0
18,530
Bambiboom, that's about the best answer I've ever received. It's got me looking for later Optiplexes that are faster, using DDR3 memory. And I've been thinking about an SSD for a while so that makes sense. But since I'm not very familiar with the scoring system(s), I don't know if the higher number is always better. Where did you find that information, is there a website or do you have software that allows you to run these comparisons?

Another computer I'm looking at now is an Optiplex 980, i5-650(1st gen) 3.2gHz. I'd like to see how it compares.
 


jbclem,

The Dell Optiplex line is interesting as they meander along a line of being above average build quality, but ultimately ordinary and forgettable for the performance enthusiast, especially the small form factor and even some of the mid-tower ones- the 755 for example- in which the CPU shroud prevents gamers from having any fun with big overclocked GTX's and the power supplies often meet their limit.

It's lucky though that very good performing GPU's like the GTX 750 Ti are smaller use less power , and are affordable since the later Optiplex that can use 2nd Generation i5 and i7 can really move pixels at a low cost.

There are a number of benchmark tests, but the one I find the most useful is Passmark Performance Test as the baselines have thousands and thousand of systems' test results posted. Since the major components- CPU / operating clock speed, motherboard, GPU drive, amount of RAM are listed and have the associated score. The results are comparative and weighted in a particular way that I think is supposed to describe the system as the performance level is experienced. This is not a completely perfect configuration, but the very lows scores reveal hardware problems and simply poor selection and very high scores tell at a glance the hardware that gets the best performance from that motherboard, CPU, GPU, drive, and etc.

A demonstration:

Advanced Search: >"Other_Model = Optiplex 980 /Date & Sorting = Sort by Rating descending"

There are 133 Optiplex 980's tested. The sorting is by the Rating descending so the the first baseline is the top overall rated 980:

Rating: 3404
CPU: 10582 (i7-4790 @ 4.0GHz)
2D: 989 (Radeon R5 240)
3D: 702
Mem: 2668 (16GB)
Disk: 4439 (Samsung 850 PRO 256GB)

Already we can see that a 4th generation i7 gets though a lot of cycles /sec and Samsung 850 Pro is a very good SSD. Remember that the disk controller is SATA II 3GB/s so the 850 Pro performance is restricted.

I do what I call a "jump test" with these baselines. By cycling through the test parameters by the top rating, I watch to see where the top rated system moves in the list and this reveal the weighting of each parameter. I know from experience that, the results of the top-rated system that the 3D score is very low- and if I filter by 3D, the top system becomes No. 27. But the CPU and disk are also heavily weighted, so by CPU, the system is No.1 and by disk No.2.

The second step is to see what hardware makes the highest score in each parameter on an Optiplex 980:

Rating: 3404 (i7-4790)
CPU: 10582 (i7-4790 @ 4.0GHz)
2D: 989 (Radeon R5 240)
3D: 3995 (GTX 750 Ti)
Mem: 2668 (16GB)
Disk: 5556 (Intel Raid 0 volume) (Software RAID 0 , actual SSD's unknown)

The lesson here is that the compact, power efficient and relatively inexpensive GTX 750 Ti does very well in a 980. That would be an appropriate, proportional cost to the value of the system too.

As you are considering an Optiplex 980 with an i5-650, a search with the i5-650 as CPU:

33 systems tested:

Top rated Optiplex 980 / i5-650:

Rating: 2306
CPU: 3350
2D: 495 (GTX 750 Ti)
3D: 3655 (GTX 750 Ti)
Mem: 1268 (16GB)
Disk: 2681 (Samsung 850 EVO 250GB)

A theme develops: GTX 750 Ti and Samsung 850.

OK, so the top performance in each parameter:

Rating: 2306
CPU: 3487
2D: 607 (GeForce GT 610)
3D: 3655 (GTX 750 Ti)
Mem: 1486 (16GB)
Disk: 2681 (Samsung 850 EVO 250GB)

This is further demonstration of the weighting as the 3D and disk scores are from the top-rated system and the CPU score is second.

I would say that the i5- 650 is not a very impressive performer though which prompts a search filtered by CPU. However, we know that the CPU score can be as high as 10582. From experience I would suggest at least a 5000 CPU score.

The top five CPU scores:

I7-4790: 10581
i7-2600: 8654
i5-2400: 6215
i7-860: 6165
i7-870: 5902
- and the i7-870 takes the next 16 places, then several i7-860's

A quick check on Ebay shows:

I7-4790: $90 to $125
i7-2600 costs from $100 to $170
i5-2400: $35 to $60
i7-860: $30-50

So, you might shop for a system with one of those according to your budget.

There are no completed listing with I7-4790 or I7-2600, but:

Dell Optiplex 980 Intel Core i7-870 2.93GHz Desktop 4GB 250GB HDD > sold for $157 free shipping

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Dell-Optiplex-980-Intel-Core-i7-870-2-93GHz-Desktop-4GB-250GB-HDD-V2094-/361447126295?hash=item5427ed7517%3Ag%3AqokAAOSwnH1Wadhn&nma=true&si=AlyssDgLHsNBdlG65kXbvCJ48%252BE%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557

-and so on, many choices.

Another tactic:

Dell Optiplex 980 Barebone Desktop PC Windows 7 COA | Add your i7 CPU | RAM | HD > sold for $40 + $12 shipping

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Dell-Optiplex-980-Barebone-Desktop-PC-Windows-7-COA-Add-your-i7-CPU-RAM-HD-/301804365704?hash=item4644f12788%3Ag%3ARIUAAOSweuxWT24b&nma=true&si=AlyssDgLHsNBdlG65kXbvCJ48%252BE%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557

And you can choose the CPU , RAM, GPU, and drives. The cost may be a bit more in total, but the combination can be done according to the test results for each component. Make sure that the system has a COA so you can reload and activate Windows without buying a new copy.

With this method, an hour of research and shopping can produce a very good system at a very reasonable price.

Cheers,

BambiBoom