TJ Hooker :
Some games are heavily dependent on single core performance, in which case clock speed matters. 2.6 GHz does seem a little low, but it also depends on what architecture the CPU is based on. What exact CPU are you looking at? I can't think of any modern quad cores that are clocked at that speed.
you would think so mate the way current cpu's are hyped.
iam2thecrowe :
its an old cpu, at 3ghz+ it still wont be as fast as a dual core intel i3 haswell or skylake.
^^ thats not the point mate he's not asking what cpu is best performing
he wants to know if his cpu is strong enough to handle the 950 without bottlenecking it.
AMD Athlon II X4 641 performs at a similar level to the core 2 quad 6600 a 2.4ghz quad
which in istelf out performs an athon64 x2 6000 by about 10% per core (hold on you'll see where im going with this
)
the 950 for its part perfoms at a similar level to the hd 5870, my old card.
i recently gave it to a mate and he paired it with an athlon64 x2 6000 and guess what it worked fine on pretty much everything thats been thrown at it. (doesnt like battlefield but then again no x2 x2 core really does
)
now if that old athlon x2 can handle an hd5870 with its poor in comparison cpu per clock performance, the amd athlon x4 which is about 15% stronger per clock per core, should easily handle the requirements of the 5870, so by default should be able to run gtx 950.
so yeah OP to my mind, there's no reason to think your cpu wont be able to handle it...