Is Xeon E5-1650 v3 3.5 GHZ the right processor for me?

neverknowu

Distinguished
Sep 19, 2012
202
1
18,695
I'm currently comparing the Xeon E5-1650 v3 3.5 GHZ and the i7-5960X 3.0 GHz.

My system will be:
Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1
2x Titan X's
4 lane pcie bm decklink (will be modified to 8 lane pcie later)
RAM undetermined at this point

I'm wondering if the i7 is worth the extra money. I'm using this is a build for heavy video effects work, and the best answer from the company I had was: "processor efficiency is that it would be better to have a 6 core if that 6 core is more efficient than the 8 core. If each core is equal to one another then the the 8 core in this case would be the better CPU to have."

Also would like to keep the heat down in my case, but as far as I could tell, these both have the same TDP at 140W.

(also, I'm eyeing the Xeon E5-2640 v3 2.6 GHz Processor, if I wanted to use a DP mobo in the future)
 
Solution
the simple explanation:

Imagine your scene divided into a grid of squares, each core will work on its own square = more cores, faster rendering.

Does that make sense?

RunLuke

Reputable
Dec 8, 2014
949
0
5,360
The Xeon is awesome for video and if there's a huge saving for you then go for it.

However two more cores means the world when working with stuff like AE or whatever you'll be using, so the i7 will be the best performer in your scenario. I don't agree with what whoever you spoke to said, maybe someone here can prove me wrong.
 

neverknowu

Distinguished
Sep 19, 2012
202
1
18,695


Thanks for the advice. I'm curious to learn more how the 2 more cores would help AE, or in my case, Davinci Resolve (sometimes AE and a similar program like Nuke or Fusion). Is there reading material? I can't find a good article online to learn more. (Or if it's a quick answer and you have a moment, love to hear the explanation!)