8320e vs 8320 20$cheaper!
- Thread starter Hawxies
- Start date
Solution
- Apr 22, 2009
- 43,150
- 411
- 131,790
Unlike the 125W FX-8320, the FX-8320e is only a 95W processor. Chances are it failed to pass muster at 125W and had to be sold as the 8320e.
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/374/AMD_FX-Series_FX-8320_vs_AMD_FX-Series_FX-8320E.html
You'll probably be able to run it as a FX-8320, but it may have a higher wattage demand than 125W. As long as you don't plan on OC'ing it beyond "stock" 8320 specs, you can probably live with it. But for $20, I'd get the real thing.
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/374/AMD_FX-Series_FX-8320_vs_AMD_FX-Series_FX-8320E.html
You'll probably be able to run it as a FX-8320, but it may have a higher wattage demand than 125W. As long as you don't plan on OC'ing it beyond "stock" 8320 specs, you can probably live with it. But for $20, I'd get the real thing.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Question Using cloning software for a dying HDD which shows only 10% health ?- Started by Mashuumatics
- Replies: 1
-
-
News Windows 11 will reportedly display a watermark if your PC does not support AI requirements- Started by Admin
- Replies: 22
-
Question Recovering an old version of a Notepad file in Windows 10 ?- Started by MC72
- Replies: 2
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram