hi
Is it true that intel k cpus have relatively shorter lifespan than non k ones , despite having better quality and being overclockable ?
I know that when a cpu is overclocked ,the heat , over voltage, stress ,etc may affect the lifespan,but my question is about when both cpus work without being overclocked.
I read about it somewhere on the net .It mentioned that k series are frail because of having less maximum temperature versus non ks.
For example when we compare i5 6600 with 6600k the Maximum operating temperature is 71 °C vs 64 °C.
If the above statement is not true,Why non k cpus can stand more heat ?(it is a big advantage)
thanks
Is it true that intel k cpus have relatively shorter lifespan than non k ones , despite having better quality and being overclockable ?
I know that when a cpu is overclocked ,the heat , over voltage, stress ,etc may affect the lifespan,but my question is about when both cpus work without being overclocked.
I read about it somewhere on the net .It mentioned that k series are frail because of having less maximum temperature versus non ks.
For example when we compare i5 6600 with 6600k the Maximum operating temperature is 71 °C vs 64 °C.
If the above statement is not true,Why non k cpus can stand more heat ?(it is a big advantage)
thanks