Longevity of Today's SSD's?

Montego

Distinguished
Sep 11, 2011
97
0
18,660
I purchased an OCZ Vertex 4 120G SSD in September of 2013 which I was using strictly as my OS drive for my desktop. Last week my system crashed due to 'no operating system detected'. It seems that my SSD had failed. I was able to reinstall my OS on a spare HHD which got me going again.
Being that my SSD came with a five (5) year warranty, I should be able to RMA for a replacement, however, I am now a bit wary of again using an SSD rather than an HHD for the OS.
I was wondering what everyone thought about the CURRENT generation of SSD's as far as longevity goes, and whether you think the that the small increase in loading speed and decrease in longevity (versus an HHD) would be worth the extra cost?
NOTE: Other than typical everyday use (email, surfing, etc.) I only use my computer for gaming and everything is loaded on separate specific HHD's (music, games, photos, and misc.).
Thanks everyone in advance for your thoughts.
 
A quality SSD is more reliable than an HDD.

Statistically speaking any component can fail so don't use your failure as an indication of expected reliability.

It's also probable that a replacement OCZ Vertex 4 has some manufacturing issues ironed out, but that's hard to say.

I do know the OCZ Vertex 4 is NOT as reliable as many of the modern ones such as Samsung offers (850 EVO for example).

So... what?

I'd use an SSD still, but have a good backup solution like Acronis True Image. I have it AUTOMATED so it backs up every week. Create a restore DVD/CD. Then, if your drive fails pop in a replacement, boot to the DVD and find the IMAGE. Maybe 30 minutes or less and you're back up and running.

Update: I mean the image on a hard drive.. the CD/DVD is only to boot into Acronis TI to enable the restore of the backup image to the new drive.