Okay, so usually I'm quite a smartass with computers but this has me stumped. To start off, here are my system specs.
OS: Windows 10 64-bit
Processor: AMD FX-8350 (8 cores, 4.0 GHz)
GPU: Radeon R9 390 (Not the 390X)
RAM: 32GB DDR3
Storage: 2x 120GB SSD (One for OS and one for games) and 2x 1TB HDD (One for less demanding games and the other for files)
Display: 1080p
So all online I'm seeing reviews and stuff that say that the R9 390 is an amazing card and will easily play any game at 1080p. What I'm noticing is that most games don't really run that well, Fallout 4 is around 50FPS (In open environments, away from the city) on average at medium settings. Dying light is around 30FPS on the lowest possible settings. These are the only two games I really play but it's annoying me that everyone says the 390 is overkill on a 1080p screen when it's performance is poor on my computer.
Any sort of help or feedback will be HIGHLY appreciated.
Thanks.
OS: Windows 10 64-bit
Processor: AMD FX-8350 (8 cores, 4.0 GHz)
GPU: Radeon R9 390 (Not the 390X)
RAM: 32GB DDR3
Storage: 2x 120GB SSD (One for OS and one for games) and 2x 1TB HDD (One for less demanding games and the other for files)
Display: 1080p
So all online I'm seeing reviews and stuff that say that the R9 390 is an amazing card and will easily play any game at 1080p. What I'm noticing is that most games don't really run that well, Fallout 4 is around 50FPS (In open environments, away from the city) on average at medium settings. Dying light is around 30FPS on the lowest possible settings. These are the only two games I really play but it's annoying me that everyone says the 390 is overkill on a 1080p screen when it's performance is poor on my computer.
Any sort of help or feedback will be HIGHLY appreciated.
Thanks.