Hello everyone,
I'm a video editor working in Premiere Pro CC and so CUDA matters for me. Basically I've seen a Kepler Titan Black for £400 - it has 2880 cores, the Maxwell 980 however, has 2048.
Whilst I understand the Titan Black has 6GB RAM opposed to the 980's 4GB and more CUDA cores, I've read that the Maxwell CUDA cores actually perform 40% faster than the Kepler architecture. So, as far as I understand you can't count CUDA for CUDA cores. What I want to know, is whether this means the 980 will be better for my rendering/CUDA performance despite having less cores (given that they're meant to have higher performance per each core apparently)?
The link about the 40% more performance is here:
https://devblogs.nvidia.com/parallelforall/maxwell-most-advanced-cuda-gpu-ever-made/
I'm a video editor working in Premiere Pro CC and so CUDA matters for me. Basically I've seen a Kepler Titan Black for £400 - it has 2880 cores, the Maxwell 980 however, has 2048.
Whilst I understand the Titan Black has 6GB RAM opposed to the 980's 4GB and more CUDA cores, I've read that the Maxwell CUDA cores actually perform 40% faster than the Kepler architecture. So, as far as I understand you can't count CUDA for CUDA cores. What I want to know, is whether this means the 980 will be better for my rendering/CUDA performance despite having less cores (given that they're meant to have higher performance per each core apparently)?
The link about the 40% more performance is here:
https://devblogs.nvidia.com/parallelforall/maxwell-most-advanced-cuda-gpu-ever-made/
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram