Question about motherboard and CPU compatibility with windows 7

BravelySam

Commendable
Apr 30, 2016
48
0
1,540
I'm planning on building my first gaming PC, and I'm very new to all this, so forgive me if these are some dumb questions.

I want a PC that can run games smoothly at at least 1080p, preferably 1440p. I have to have Windows 7, it's what I'm used to and I don't want anything else. Do motherboards/CPUs/any other parts have to be explicitly compatible with an OS? Besides the OS, the only other decisions I've made about this PC is that I'm interested in the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X, and I'm interested in using two of them with Crossfire.

With all that in mind, what motherboards and CPUs are likely best for me? And is compatibility between those and Windows 7 even an issue? Also, if I'm getting two Radeon Fury Xs, how big of a case will I need for them? I'm so new and I don't want to make any stupid mistakes. Any help will be appreciated!
 
Solution
Windows 7 does have limitations in terms of what hardware in can support. Fortunately those limitations are confined for the most part to multi-cpu environments and CPUs with more than 256 cores, so you have nothing to worry about - any 32bit or 64bit CPU will be compatible with Windows 7. This is the system requirements page for Windows 7: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/products/system-requirements

The motherboard and the CPU must have matching socket types, and the memory (RAM) you choose must be of the same type as the motherboard supports (DDR3 / DDR4 are both equally prevalent now, but no motherboard to my knowledge supports both types). The GPU will present some compatibility considerations too, specifically whether...

HeuristicToaster

Commendable
Mar 27, 2016
23
0
1,540
Windows 7 does have limitations in terms of what hardware in can support. Fortunately those limitations are confined for the most part to multi-cpu environments and CPUs with more than 256 cores, so you have nothing to worry about - any 32bit or 64bit CPU will be compatible with Windows 7. This is the system requirements page for Windows 7: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/products/system-requirements

The motherboard and the CPU must have matching socket types, and the memory (RAM) you choose must be of the same type as the motherboard supports (DDR3 / DDR4 are both equally prevalent now, but no motherboard to my knowledge supports both types). The GPU will present some compatibility considerations too, specifically whether the motherboard supports crossfire and whether the PSU can provide them with enough power.

As far as CPU recommendations go, 1080p gaming isn't too affected and from PCs I've built in the past anything from quad core AMD CPUs like the FX 4000 series or the i3 4370 upwards don't cause an FPS bottleneck in a majority of games. From what you've said you're after solid performance, so I would recommend looking at something like the FX 6000 series or, a better option, an i5 4690K as a starting point. The better the CPU, the faster the game can do a lot of the logic processing (like AI and loading things) - you want it to be good enough that it is always ready to process environment changes and pass instructions to the GPU.

Fury Xs are smaller than the average GPU (most mATX or ATX cases will be alright) but they do have an external 120mm water cooling block / fan, so any case you choose will have to have a nearby 120mm mount for the radiator. In your case two Fury Xs might be a little overkill insofar as 1080p / 1440p gaming goes. I'm not the best person to ask for a GPU recommendation as I have only limited experience with AMDs line, but my single R9 290X is capable of running every game I've chucked at it in 1080p/60fps/ultra. It's also capable of eyefinity (5760x1080) at 60fps on high / ultra for most games too, so I imagine a single Fury X would serve you just as well as two (and save you £500 you can put into other components). From looking at benchmarks, the Fury X can handle 4K games nicely, so 1440p should be a breeze

Hope that helps! If you have any specific hardware in mind, let us know and we can confirm whether it's compatible for your system or not
 
Solution

Sherylinrm1

Commendable
Apr 29, 2016
48
0
1,560
I am looking into this same thing myself and found that gigabyte motherboards now require me to download and pre-install an app before installing windows 7.

So yes they will work with win7 but you have some gymnastics to do first for some of them.

Just a heads up. :)
 

BravelySam

Commendable
Apr 30, 2016
48
0
1,540
Well, I've learned a lot in the last few days and I've decided on pretty much everything. I'm going with an I7-6700K, an Asus Z170-Deluxe motherboard, and for the GPU, I'm actually gonna go with a GeForce GTX 980 Ti. I have one new question though: the I7-6700K says it's not compatible with Ram any faster than 2133 MHz, but lots of people use faster Ram with it just fine. If I were to get some DDR4-2400 Ram, would I have to mess with any settings to get it to work right, or what? I don't think I plan on doing any overclocking, so should I avoid that?
 

Sherylinrm1

Commendable
Apr 29, 2016
48
0
1,560
I used faster ram on a MB that was not compatible with the CPU I had.
It simply would not go full speed is all.
However I have heard of others that the ram defaulted to the lowest setting and never worked any higher.

Your mileage may vary however that is my personal experience.

Try to get the best you can afford but nothing higher if it is not compatible.

Hope this helps. :)
 

Sherylinrm1

Commendable
Apr 29, 2016
48
0
1,560
Best way to look at speeds versus width [or amount] is this.
{yeah I use to do tech deacades ago lol}.

Ok so you have a truck that can do 100 mph on a one lane highway.
You also have a truck that can do 200 mph on a one lane highway.
Obviously the faster truck can move more cargo in an hour.

However, if you have four trucks doing 100mph on four lanes then it will do twice as much as the one truick doing 200mph.

Get it?

So yes sometime more ram can compensate for faster ram.

As in, if you have 4 gigs of 2666 ram. Or 8 gigs of 1333 ram. For bigger files then they are the same. I think only for tiny files is the faster ram faster in this case.
By tiny I mean like 4K.
But then again the CPU's cache would take care of those smaller files itself and not even bother the ram.


Anyhow, that was how I was taught and use to teach it. And computers have not evolved much in some ways.
A bus is still a bus even if it serial or parallel etc.
It can only move so much data at a given speed and amount at any one time.

Hope this helps :)