Will the GTX1080 saturate 8 lanes of PCI-E 3.0?

thanatos2k

Commendable
May 10, 2016
8
0
1,510
Or is it too early to tell?

Hoping to add another Samsung 950 Pro in my GA-Z170X Gaming 7 board, but if I do that the 10GbE PCI-E x8 card has to move to the secondary PCI-E x16 GPU slot, which will clock the main x16 slot down to 8 lanes. On my current GTX 680 Classified card that wouldn't be a problem, but when the new 1080 arrives would it need more than 8 lanes @ 3.0 speeds?
 
Solution


and this got anything todo with what?
since the 980ti and even titan did nowhere near saturate x8, why would 1080 since its not even 2x as powerful?

please stop speculating so hardcore until benchmarks are out
and on teh speculating side
do you really think Nvidia would intentionally hamper their SLI sales by saturating the lanes to such a degree where SLI would be even more discouraged? since the vast majority of people are/would be running on x8 lanes for SLI

Gnuffi

Honorable
Sep 14, 2013
967
1
11,360


and this got anything todo with what?
since the 980ti and even titan did nowhere near saturate x8, why would 1080 since its not even 2x as powerful?

please stop speculating so hardcore until benchmarks are out
and on teh speculating side
do you really think Nvidia would intentionally hamper their SLI sales by saturating the lanes to such a degree where SLI would be even more discouraged? since the vast majority of people are/would be running on x8 lanes for SLI
 
Solution

SoNic67

Distinguished
I don't think so... PCIe 3.0 on x8 mode is still VERY fast. A single PCIe 3.0 lane, at 8GT/s, can send 985MB/s. Times 8 means 7.88GB/s
That's similar to PCIe 2.0 x16.

I think that's more than needed, even for 2560x1440 gaming.
 

thanatos2k

Commendable
May 10, 2016
8
0
1,510


Thanks, that was the data point I was looking for, Ofc can't know till we see data but that's a solid comparison, especially with a dual GPU Titan.