Skylake benefits from very highly clocked RAM, and you can only use higher than 2133 with a Z170 board. However, an i5 has 4 real cores, vs 2, so it really depends on what you're doing.
I'm not a big fan of non-K overclocking, so my vote is for the i5, though it depends on the i5. An i5 6400 has pretty low clocks, whereas a 6500 turbos only 100mhz lower than the i3 - unnoticeably slower per core, and with twice as many cores.
^^He's not a fan. I am tho. For a really good indepth look at the 6100+z170 board+ higher clocked ram watch this video, it's worth your time and might make you rethink some things : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3G-7bfPG2dE
If you fully understand the advantages you can go for a better mobo and higher speed ram as it will help in CPU bound scenarios with the i3 and then when you have more money you can get an i5/i7 and you'll be ready for what those have to offer.
Skylake benefits from very highly clocked RAM, and you can only use higher than 2133 with a Z170 board. However, an i5 has 4 real cores, vs 2, so it really depends on what you're doing.
Skylake benefits from very highly clocked RAM, and you can only use higher than 2133 with a Z170 board. However, an i5 has 4 real cores, vs 2, so it really depends on what you're doing.
That's pretty obvious for him, i'd hope atleast..
The cool thing with the i3 is that if you're on a tight budget and you add faster clocked ram and OC the CPU and you can pretty much get better performance than a 2500k and then you can sell the i3 and get an i5/i7 and then enjoy your already really fast RAM and OC'ing capabilities with a nice mobo. To me that's more worth it than getting an i5 and getting a cheap mobo that forces you to use slower ram.
But of course, if the money isn't the problem the i5/7 is the obvious choice.