Is it worth it for AMD and Nvidia is make multi-GPU video cards? Considering:
- Poor SLI and XFire driver support and game support
- Poor SLI and XFire performance scaling (2 GTX 980s in SLI =/= 200% GTX 980)
- Memory capacity of only one GPU
- Higher TDP
- Manufacturing and design costs
- Low demand
The best modern example of a "successful" multi-GPU is the R9 295X2 because it was in the affordable price range. Bad examples are when AMD/Nvidia try to do it with expensive GPUs like they did with the Titan Z and the R9 Pro Dual.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you were the head of Nvidia or AMD would you make a multi-GPU video card for an newer architecture such as Pascal, or Polaris, or Vega? Or are multi-GPU video cards a failed dream of the past?
- Poor SLI and XFire driver support and game support
- Poor SLI and XFire performance scaling (2 GTX 980s in SLI =/= 200% GTX 980)
- Memory capacity of only one GPU
- Higher TDP
- Manufacturing and design costs
- Low demand
The best modern example of a "successful" multi-GPU is the R9 295X2 because it was in the affordable price range. Bad examples are when AMD/Nvidia try to do it with expensive GPUs like they did with the Titan Z and the R9 Pro Dual.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you were the head of Nvidia or AMD would you make a multi-GPU video card for an newer architecture such as Pascal, or Polaris, or Vega? Or are multi-GPU video cards a failed dream of the past?