watrhous :
So will I get full benefit from a 6gb ssd vs a 3gb ssd? Or is there something i need to look for to determine which would be practical to avoid wasted attributes...?
A laptop HDD's sequential speeds are about 125 MB/s. A SSD's sequential speeds on SATA 3 are about 500 MB/s. 4x faster.
A laptop HDD's 4k speeds are about 0.7 MB/s. A SSD's 4k speeds are about 30-70 MB/s. 40x to 100x faster.
If the SATA interface supports NCQ (queuing multiple small file requests, instead of waiting for one task to complete before giving it another task), its 4k speeds can go up to 200-400 MB/s. So now it's several hundred times faster than a HDD. This is what makes a SSD feel so much faster than a HDD. It's not the sequential speeds that everyone and drive manufacturers obsess over; it's the 4k speeds.
Note that these 4k speeds are almost all below the SATA 2 speed limit (300 MB/s). Only large sequential file read/writes will be slower with SATA 2. That's mostly benchmarks and (if you had a second SSD) copying movies from one SSD to another. About the only real-life task where high sequential speeds really matter is real-time video editing. The vast majority of files a computer accesses on a drive are small (4k) to medium (a few megabytes). And with current SSDs these will almost always fall below the SATA 2 speed limit.
So yeah, upgrading a laptop with SATA 2 to a SSD is worth it. The main thing you should be worried about is whether or not the laptop's SATA interface supports NCQ (since that makes about a 5x difference in speed of 4k read/writes). Some SATA 2 laptops have it, some don't. NCQ is a part of the AHCI command set. So if the laptop has AHCI mode available in the BIOS, then it will support NCQ and you are good to go. (This is also why it's important to change the computer from SATA to AHCI mode when you upgrade to a SSD.)