XaveT :
Really, you are looking for a switch with a high count of packets switched per second. I don't usually see this statistic on consumer grade stuff
And the reason for that is because monolithic switch ICs are usually non-blocking - they are designed to sustain the full line speed and packet rate across all ports as long as no individual port's capacity gets exceeded by any meaningful amount. That's why these chips can manage to get away with having only 256-512KB of packet buffer SRAM.
Unlike managed routers and switches, those monolithic ICs are hard-wired to do their job, which eliminates the route/switch processor as a potential bottleneck. The main bottlenecks in them is how well they manage concurrent accesses to the packet buffer and MAC lookup table.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/unmanaged-gigabit-ethernet-switch-roundup,4321-5.html
Here, you see that in a typical single client-server connection, all three switches are effectively indistinguishable from a straight cable. Even in the worst case "mesh" scenario, the slowest switch is only 8% slower than straight cable and an even less significant 3% slower than the best switch in that same scenario.
For most everyday uses, the performance difference between the best-case (straight cable) and the worst switch under the worst conditions is negligible.