Rafael Mestdag Reputable Mar 25, 2014 1,442 1 5,460 Jun 25, 2016 #1 I decided to buy an FX6300 instead of a 4th gen i3. I know the i3 is superior but in terms of bang for your buck, did I do a good deal? Considering I'm a gamer and do some light editing every now and then?
I decided to buy an FX6300 instead of a 4th gen i3. I know the i3 is superior but in terms of bang for your buck, did I do a good deal? Considering I'm a gamer and do some light editing every now and then?
Solution ema21del9 Jun 25, 2016 The i3 have better per-core performance, it's really up to what use are gooing to give the computer. I would have go with Intel side though.
The i3 have better per-core performance, it's really up to what use are gooing to give the computer. I would have go with Intel side though.
S Suzuki@1473780084@1473780163 Dignified Mar 8, 2015 5,283 1 15,960 Jun 25, 2016 #2 Depends on overall cost of the PC. Between the FX and a 4th gen i3 the FX is a better CPU for you. Upvote 0 Downvote
envy14tpe Champion Mar 3, 2012 9,574 14 56,665 Jun 25, 2016 #3 It's good only as long as you overclock it. At stock, the i3 is much better. Are you gonna overclock the fx-6300? Upvote 0 Downvote
It's good only as long as you overclock it. At stock, the i3 is much better. Are you gonna overclock the fx-6300?
Rafael Mestdag Reputable Mar 25, 2014 1,442 1 5,460 Jun 25, 2016 #4 envy14tpe : It's good only as long as you overclock it. At stock, the i3 is much better. Are you gonna overclock the fx-6300? I've had a 4th gen i3 and although I liked it very much, I don't intend to overclock the FX6300 just now. It seems fast enough for me for now, Upvote 0 Downvote
envy14tpe : It's good only as long as you overclock it. At stock, the i3 is much better. Are you gonna overclock the fx-6300? I've had a 4th gen i3 and although I liked it very much, I don't intend to overclock the FX6300 just now. It seems fast enough for me for now,
ema21del9 Reputable May 23, 2016 556 0 5,160 Jun 25, 2016 Solution #5 The i3 have better per-core performance, it's really up to what use are gooing to give the computer. I would have go with Intel side though. Upvote 0 Downvote Solution
The i3 have better per-core performance, it's really up to what use are gooing to give the computer. I would have go with Intel side though.
envy14tpe Champion Mar 3, 2012 9,574 14 56,665 Jun 25, 2016 #6 Rafael Mestdag : envy14tpe : It's good only as long as you overclock it. At stock, the i3 is much better. Are you gonna overclock the fx-6300? I've had a 4th gen i3 and although I liked it very much, I don't intend to overclock the FX6300 just now. It seems fast enough for me for now, 4th gen i3 outperforms the fx-6300 at stock. But to each his own... Upvote 0 Downvote
Rafael Mestdag : envy14tpe : It's good only as long as you overclock it. At stock, the i3 is much better. Are you gonna overclock the fx-6300? I've had a 4th gen i3 and although I liked it very much, I don't intend to overclock the FX6300 just now. It seems fast enough for me for now, 4th gen i3 outperforms the fx-6300 at stock. But to each his own...