Is high voltage ok while the cpu has good temp?

ShadowRD

Distinguished
May 3, 2016
109
9
18,695
the only way i get an stable OC on my 8350 is with 1.52v, i know is too high, i shouldn't pass 1.5v but with 4 hours with aida64 (CPU and FPU stress) the average temp is 62.5 and the maximum is 64. i could get better temps with some intake fans and maybe some pulls fan to the radiator, right now i only have two push fans on the radiator and the default exhaust fan in the back of the case

so i just want to know if i could keep this OC at that Voltage or underclock a little bit to not pass 1.5v

CPU: fx-8350
Mobo: Gigabyte 970a-ud3p
cpu cooler: corsair h115i
 
Solution
I would say as good a board as the ud3p is you're pushing it with 4.8ghz above 1.5v personally.
If you wanted those kind of results you should have been looking at a board with 220w tdp support really.

Its a good result you have for what it is on essentially a fairly budget 970 series board.
Your chip is plain average to require that voltage but that's the luck of the draw.
High voltages will slowly degrade your CPU, the faster, the warmer. I find it hard to believe that you need 1.52V for a stable overclock. You should be able to get a stable overclock at a much lower voltage. You should not need to underclock stock to get the voltage down.
 

ShadowRD

Distinguished
May 3, 2016
109
9
18,695


i tried with 1.51 and the system freeze after an hour and 15 minutes with aida64 stress (CPU n FPU). i was testing with lower voltage and add 0.5 after each try until the system got stable, and that was the final voltage to get stable

i forgot to mention that the OC is @ 4.8
 
So your issue is that you cannot get a stable 4.8Ghz overclock at less than 1.52V? That's a lot different to not getting a stable overclock.

Every CPU is individual dues to slight manufacturing differences (like people), so it is possible that's as good as you can get. What overclocking guide/procedure are you following? Have you changed things other than Voltage and multiplier?
 
Temperatures aren't even remotely close to voltage in terms of CPU degradation. A high voltage even if the temperatures are reasonable, is bad/much worse than higher temperatures but lower voltage.

I'm surprised your motherboard let you use 1.52V without displaying a warning message. Just keep in mind that if the CPU heats up too much during boot, you may end up in a loop where you have to reset the BIOS if it doesn't do it automatically.

0.5V seems like too much. I raise the voltage by 0.006250 at a time on the FX CPU's.


All the best!
 

ShadowRD

Distinguished
May 3, 2016
109
9
18,695


i have only changed voltage and multiplier



how can i know the temp during boot?, i use HWiNFO but the maximum temp that it reads i suppose is when the program open during log in, if i could use that temp so it has never pass 50c during boot


 
I would say as good a board as the ud3p is you're pushing it with 4.8ghz above 1.5v personally.
If you wanted those kind of results you should have been looking at a board with 220w tdp support really.

Its a good result you have for what it is on essentially a fairly budget 970 series board.
Your chip is plain average to require that voltage but that's the luck of the draw.
 
Solution

ShadowRD

Distinguished
May 3, 2016
109
9
18,695


thanks, i know i should stay in/under 1.5v, i will test @ 4.7 under 1.5v

thanks for your time
 


np mate,I would suggest (this is chip & ram speed dependant though) that the ud3p is very good when using a combo of mulitplier & fsb overclocking - this is ram dependant though really as fsb clocks also affect ram speed.
What ive always found is that a fsb clock of 218 ( if you have 1866mhz ram & set it to 1600mhz first/or 1600mhz ram & set to 1333mhz) & then use the multiplier will give you essentially the same or similar cpu overclock & native ram speed at substantially less voltage.
 

ShadowRD

Distinguished
May 3, 2016
109
9
18,695


i will try that, lets see what happen