I explained it in a simplified way, but Ecky's statement is perfectly correct.
It is still true that, at high enough settings (not usual to buy a new PC to play on low, right?) the CPU can push a lot more frames than any current GPU.
The only exceptions would be if, for some reason, someone would want to build a system to play 720p on low settings with 200+ fps (as some people with CS games). In that case, the CPU would be the limit.
But for regular scenarios (1080p or more, high settings or more, aiming between 60 and 100 fps), both cpus are equally powerful, more than enough for a 1070 or even a 1080. Performance difference, if any, would be ~5%, except very few VERY cou intensive games, where the difference could go uo to 10%. I can't comment about SLI, since I haven't seen relevant benchmarks.