Best budget lga1150 CPU for GTX 1080?

G

Guest

Guest
Hello guys!
I am looking for a budget Cpu $100-300 for the GTX 1080 :)
Can I just turn the PC off install the Cpu then turn it on and I'm done? Or Is it more complicated?
Specs:
i5 4460
16GB DDR3 RAM corsair vengeance
Mobo: Asus h81m-plus LGA1150 (I will not be changing Mobo

Thanks!


 
Solution


OP, your current CPU is perfectly fine for a GTX 1080.
It may not perform on par with an i7, but it will not bottleneck the 1080 at all.
If you really want to upgrade, as mentioned above the Xeon e3 1231v3 is perfect, but I don't think that it is worth the money honestly. I think it would be better spent on a larger future upgrade to say a Kaby Lake or Cannonlake i7, as your current CPU will do you just fine for the next year plus.

With installing CPUs, what you want to do is wipe the graphics drivers of the previous CPU, then its just a matter of swapping out the CPUs and installing new drivers.
Then you're set.
Edit: Note that this is a general method I use for changing CPUs. In your case, you do not need to...


OP, your current CPU is perfectly fine for a GTX 1080.
It may not perform on par with an i7, but it will not bottleneck the 1080 at all.
If you really want to upgrade, as mentioned above the Xeon e3 1231v3 is perfect, but I don't think that it is worth the money honestly. I think it would be better spent on a larger future upgrade to say a Kaby Lake or Cannonlake i7, as your current CPU will do you just fine for the next year plus.

With installing CPUs, what you want to do is wipe the graphics drivers of the previous CPU, then its just a matter of swapping out the CPUs and installing new drivers.
Then you're set.
Edit: Note that this is a general method I use for changing CPUs. In your case, you do not need to install any drivers due to the fact that Xeon chips (Unlike consumer grade CPUs) do not have graphical capabilities, although it is still probably worth removing any integrated graphics drivers that may be present on your system to minimize the chance of compatibility issues.

 
Solution

talking about Intel integrated graphics drivers, which should always be installed in case your graphics card fails imo, and will always be installed if someone happens to be upgrading from a prebuilt, so its best to be safe.
 

Rogue Leader

It's a trap!
Moderator
Um you do realize the Xeon E3 1231v3 does not have an integrated GPU, so yeah those drivers don't exist.

Lets just say it did however iGPU drivers do not need to be installed if your GPU fails windows will default to its generic driver.

Source: I own a E3 Xeon 1231v3
 


True, but I always like to have it there as a precaution, doesn't take up much space! :)
Also in regards to the drivers, i'm aware that Xeon processors do not have integrated graphics nor drivers, but in the above post I was speaking in general for the majority of consumer CPU changes, although you are entirely correct! Should have made it more clear.
Cheers.
 

Rogue Leader

It's a trap!
Moderator


No it doesn't but it can cause crashes and compatibility issues as some of our users have found. There is literally no reason to install drivers you do not need, especially in the case of a processor that has no drivers because it has no iGPU!

Suffice to say there is no such thing as CPU drivers (well not anymore anyway) the last processors that had them of any sort were AMD Phenom processors.

Other than removing and replacing the CPU there are no driver changes needed to be made and if anything you are inviting problems.

PS very clever editing, but you should just edit out the entire line about drivers, the guy is not using an iGPU!
 

I think you're misunderstanding me....
I'm saying that one should install iGPU drivers IF the processor in question has them.
This is a more general method than case specific, which I probably should have added in. (I'll edit the post now)
The generic windows driver is perfectly fine, but note that I am not telling OP to install ANY graphics drivers due to the fact that the Xeon does not have an iGPU.

You're right I should just edit that all out, but in the case of most consumer CPUs (Pentium/i3/i5/i7) there will be integrated graphics drivers which are handy to have if your discrete graphics card fails I find, and doing it on installation just seems like a more practical way to go about it imho. In addition, the main reason I've gotten into this habit of installing integrated graphics drivers recently is purely because of the upcoming Multiadapter feature in DX12, which utilizes multiple GPUs in your system alongside discrete cards which helps bump up performance a bit, hence the overall reason I even bother with the damned things.
I've never used them in the past, but I wanted to go about this in a way which doesn't overcomplicate the issue, rather simplifying it into 'Install and forget' for forum posters.

I understand where you're coming from, and I fully grasp the fact that you're trying to notify me of quite a critical thing, but you came off as a little rude in your response, so i'd appreciate it if you took a different tone in posting before allowing me to justify. :(
Thanks for your reply though.
Cheers, Chugalug

EDIT: Out of curiosity, and knowledge in future posts regarding iGPUs, what variety of issues were encountered in regards to compatibility with integrated graphics drivers?

 

Rogue Leader

It's a trap!
Moderator
Users have had conflicting driver problems between their iGPUs and new GPUs, its not common but it has happened. I don't have time to research it but I've seen it here more than once (but more commonly on the AMD side).

Microsoft announced that DX12 multi adaptor feature mainly to work between 2 discrete GPUs, the last article I read it sounded like they were abandoning using iGPUs because of the lack of power compared to discrete GPUs. Either way it must be programmed into a game to work (hopefully we see more soon).

The problem here is your original response was wrong and confusing, and we as moderators want to prevent misinformation. If the OP never comes back hes going to be looking for CPU drivers that don't exist. In addition with your edit now hes taking an unnecessary step that makes more sense but may cause more harm than good.

So I appreciate your edits and hopefully the OP is not on a wild goose chase for CPU drivers right now.
 


Ah, I see. Thanks for informing me of this! :)
I appreciate you going out of your way to help minimize misinformation, definitely helpful stuff, as otherwise I would have continued about this in other relevant threads.
Thanks once again.