Im running an AMD Fx 8320 with a gtx 760 and am trying to get better frames!!!

jomax99

Commendable
Jul 26, 2016
9
0
1,510
Ive been playing arma for quite a while now and I'm tired of the low frames on some multiplayer servers. on single player I can get great frames on ultra. right now I'm looking at upgrading heres my to choices

NVidia gtx 1070 = ~500$

OR

get an i5 and a new MB = ~300$

and it really bothers me that ANY other game I play my frames are PERFECT but on arma 3 multiplayer they are complete SHIT what should I do
 
Solution


The GPU is kinda always "bottlenecking the CPU". If you were to play a game like Battlefield or Metro or run a heavy benchmark with uncapped fps you would see that your GPU would be maxed at 100% while the CPU would probably be somewhere in the 50-80% range depending on what CPU you have. Does this mean the GPU is bottlenecking the CPU? I suppose, but it's an odd way to look at it. Generally the CPU does less work while gaming so the usage will almost always be beneath the GPU usage and almost always less than 100%. That's why most people don't consider it bottlenecking when CPU usage is...

iyzik

Distinguished
Jun 1, 2012
901
0
19,160
Can you download a monitoring program like MSI Afterburner and set several things to display while you're paying games; GPU usage, GPU temp, CPU usage, CPU temp, FPS. And take a look at what they are all saying while you are experiencing low framerate.
 


Arma is heavily CPU dependent in multiplayer.
Get teh i5 6500 and a new MB. This way your "PERFECT" frames from SP will maintain in MP.
 

jomax99

Commendable
Jul 26, 2016
9
0
1,510


yes no matter what settings I'm on I get the SAME frames
 

jomax99

Commendable
Jul 26, 2016
9
0
1,510


if you don't mind me asking where does your knowledge come from not saying I don't agree with you just asking
 


Knowledge: countless posts about Arma's CPU vbound nature.
Logic: If the GPU were your problem, you would have a bad time in single player aswell since the GPU doesn;t care if you are in SP or MP. It just renders stuff. Whereas teh CPU workload changes dramatically when going from SP to MP in some cases, such as this one.
 


After remove the cpu bottleneck you will be able to adjust settings for playable performance again.
 

iyzik

Distinguished
Jun 1, 2012
901
0
19,160


The GPU is kinda always "bottlenecking the CPU". If you were to play a game like Battlefield or Metro or run a heavy benchmark with uncapped fps you would see that your GPU would be maxed at 100% while the CPU would probably be somewhere in the 50-80% range depending on what CPU you have. Does this mean the GPU is bottlenecking the CPU? I suppose, but it's an odd way to look at it. Generally the CPU does less work while gaming so the usage will almost always be beneath the GPU usage and almost always less than 100%. That's why most people don't consider it bottlenecking when CPU usage is significantly lower than GPU..it's to be expected.
 
Solution

jomax99

Commendable
Jul 26, 2016
9
0
1,510
thank you guys for all your help I went ahead and purchased a i5 4690k and a new motherboard and in a few months I will get a 1070

was that the right thing to do?
 

iyzik

Distinguished
Jun 1, 2012
901
0
19,160


I probably would've gotten an i5-6600K but yeah.
 

jomax99

Commendable
Jul 26, 2016
9
0
1,510


hey was just checking back on this I noticed your rig was posted and you have a 4670k with a 1070 was curious if you do well in arma, if you even play it??

 

iyzik

Distinguished
Jun 1, 2012
901
0
19,160


I've never played it, sorry