junkeymonkey :
if you paid for things to find you now cant use them or got to go rent from steam ? maybe you enjoy that ?? I got good money in my games that I hold the games '' fully on a retail disk no steam no uplay no internet required no 3ed party malware clients .. not games I got to hope steam lets me play and in the end you really got nothing unless ''they'' allow you to [LOL] suckers... that's right usafret good for them , I don't need a OS that renders my stuff useless but maybe you like that ??? then good for you
these are games / programs for windows but just not win 10 anymore they don't want you to ''own'' software you get it off the cloud at there terms as they see fit
sad thing is vista was better os and better received then 10 has
you sure can tell when the truth hurts
I don't quite think you know that much about OSes or how well they were received.
Vista was not a better OS. The original version of Superfetch in it caused issues. It wasn't a good OS until SP1 and it took time for the normal consumer hardware to be decent enough to even consider Vista, most systems had too low RAN and single core CPUs while Vista ran better with 2GB, 4GB preferably, and dual cores.
Vista was by no means a horrible OS but it was not better than 10, even fully patched, performance and quality wise.
As for its reception, Vista was hated. Most people stuck with XP until 7 came out. 7 was better received than Vista but the funny thing is that 10 has been outpacing adoption of Windows 7 by 140% and 7 was vastly better received than Vista.
As for SecuROM, that was a flawed DRM that no one cares about. I use Steam because it is convenient. I no longer have to keep track of a disc or key code. I have been using it for quite a while and unless there is a country ending event I doubt Steam is going anywhere, especially considering the next closest competition is still considered crap.