Why aren't all CPUs overclockable?

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Oaklandmurphy

Oaklandmurphy

Respectable
Jun 1, 2016
172
0
1,860
Is there any technical reason to lock a CPU clock? Is it just a sham to force people to pay more for overclockability or is it actually more expensive to produce an unlocked processor? Also, why is it that only Intel seems to do this. All of the vishera CPUs were overclockable, so why not the core series?
 
Solution
scuzzycard


It's business strategy. For example - A Pentium G3240 and an i7 4790K are the same silicon, but the Pentium has 2 cores disabled, hyperthreading disabled, 5MB of its cached disabled, the ability to run 1600MHz memory disabled, and it is multiplier-locked at 3.1GHz.

It's true that there is a binning process and that sometimes these capabilities are disabled because the CPU was an inferior sample, but Intel's yields are...
Sort by date Sort by votes
O

Oliver_21

Commendable
Feb 17, 2016
207
0
1,760
Unlocked CPUs are chips that demonstrated a better overclocking potential hence they decided to unlock them

But as many people mentioned here because they can get more money if they make unlocked CPUs more expensive

However I head every single CPU is overclockeable but some of them are much better for example the haswell non K CPUs are very bad at OC compared to sany or ivy bridge whereas you can OC a non K skylake CPU through BCLK and get very admirable OC capabilities (as long as you have a Z170 mobo and downgrade the bios version to v1.0)

Here's the proof
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiw2r-_AdGM

 
Upvote 0 Downvote
scuzzycard

scuzzycard

Honorable
Feb 26, 2016
1,583
0
12,960


It's business strategy. For example - A Pentium G3240 and an i7 4790K are the same silicon, but the Pentium has 2 cores disabled, hyperthreading disabled, 5MB of its cached disabled, the ability to run 1600MHz memory disabled, and it is multiplier-locked at 3.1GHz.

It's true that there is a binning process and that sometimes these capabilities are disabled because the CPU was an inferior sample, but Intel's yields are outstanding so most of these CPUs are crippled just to meet the demand for the target market segment.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Solution
S

sizzling

Titan
Oct 18, 2006
27,231
3,301
112,240
Agree most of it comes down to business strategy, the cost to make most things bares no relevance the cost the consumer pays, just look at how much cost increase there is with most phones if you go for 64gb storage over 32gb. The cost to the manufacture is going to be tiny but you can pay £50-£100 more. Car automatic gearboxes are cheaper to make than manual but in the UK you pay a premium.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Tradesman1

Tradesman1

Legenda in Aeternum
Jun 5, 2013
67,883
40
126,960
In large part because all CPUs are individual items, you can take a ton of any particular model of CPU and all will be slightly different. K models (OCable) are primarily the better binned chips, but even then how well they will OC will differ, take the 4770K as an example

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013/06/01/intel_haswell_i74770k_ipc_overclocking_review/6#.V66Yi00rJD_

They also break things down even further to offer a variety of 'CPUs' to meet most any budget ;)
 
Upvote 1 Downvote
M

mitsoevo

Commendable
Sep 6, 2016
64
0
1,660
I have an intel i5 6600k, however there is also an intel i5 6600, there is no difference besides my k model can be overclocked, it is as simple as flicking a switch for them to determine whether the 6600 is able to be OC or not. that being said they do make sure that the k models are the better quality of the bunch, this usually makes no difference noticeable difference if you arent OC the cpu but its adds a little reasoning to the cost difference, however most of the cost is just profit for them, which is fair enough, its their product they have the right to charge what they want, and if they didnt have oc and non-oc models then the price would be somewhat of an avg therefor those who arent going to oc are spending money which they otherwise wouldnt have to.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
scuzzycard

scuzzycard

Honorable
Feb 26, 2016
1,583
0
12,960
It's also not just about keeping end users from overclocking certain SKU's, but also to prevent counterfeit chips from being on the market. This used to happen all the time before Intel started locking multipliers in the P-II days.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom