G.skill Ripjaws DDR3L 1600 CL9 dual or single rank?

charitarthlal

Commendable
Aug 11, 2016
5
0
1,510
Is the G.SKILL Ripjaws 8GB DDR3L SO-DIMM 1600 CL9 Model F3-1600C9S-8GRSL single rank or dual? Also how is Kingston HyperX Impact 1600 CL9 Model HX316LS9IB/8 in comparison?
 
Solution
Performance of dual rank memory versus single rank memory depends on how software uses the memory.

Dual rank memory can have more data available to the software almost immediately which can improve performance if, the data has already been requested previously. However, if data is not immediately available (on current selected rank), then the other rank will have to be selected and the required data found. This can cause a slight reduction in performance.

With single rank memory, there is no delay in having to select ranks as there is no other rank to select, so this means performance would not be affected. And in theory, single rank may be overall a bit faster as there is no other rank to select.

Generally though, there is very...
Due to lack of specifications from G.Skill, it is unknown for sure whether memory module F3-1600C9S-8GRSL is single or dual ranked. However, from close up photos of the module, it is suspected that it is a dual ranked module with sixteen memory chips due to the module PCB layout. But this is not certain. Confirmation will have to be made either from G.Skill or someone who knows for certain what the module ranking arrangement is.

Kingston memory module HX316LS9IB/8 is definitely dual ranked (with sixteen memory chips at 8 bit data width).
 

charitarthlal

Commendable
Aug 11, 2016
5
0
1,510


Thanks for the detailed answer.
So is it safe to assume that HyperX modules will be a bit better in performance of the two(if g.skill ones are really single rank)? Also, Kingston claims the HyperX has auto-overclocking. Does it really work or it is just marketing gimmick?
Regards.
 
Performance of dual rank memory versus single rank memory depends on how software uses the memory.

Dual rank memory can have more data available to the software almost immediately which can improve performance if, the data has already been requested previously. However, if data is not immediately available (on current selected rank), then the other rank will have to be selected and the required data found. This can cause a slight reduction in performance.

With single rank memory, there is no delay in having to select ranks as there is no other rank to select, so this means performance would not be affected. And in theory, single rank may be overall a bit faster as there is no other rank to select.

Generally though, there is very little or no noticeable difference in performance between single and dual rank memory (for standard desktop and laptop computers using UDIMM's and SODIMM's). If there is a choice of single rank versus dual rank memory, then single rank memory may be the better choice overall.

The memory from Kingston with "auto-overclocking" is the "Fury" series of HyperX memory. And provided the computer BIOS memory options are set to "auto", the Fury series of memory will automatically make BIOS adjustments to run the memory as fast as the memory and computer will allow.

This auto over-clocking of memory does work, provided the computer is otherwise capable of doing so.

Note that the Fury series of memory is ONLY available in standard desktop configuration (UDIMM), and is NOT available in laptop/notebook configuration (SODIMM).
 
Solution

charitarthlal

Commendable
Aug 11, 2016
5
0
1,510


I am quoting the following features listed on official Kingston hyperxgaming.com website:

"SO-DIMM form factor features stylish and slim thermal label for an easy fit
Capacities 4GB, 8GB (single) and 8GB, 16GB (kits)
Speeds 1600MHz–2400MHz
Latency CL9-CL12
Voltage 1.35V
Easy installation and automatic overclocking; no adjustments in BIOS needed
Eco-friendly with low voltage settings for cooler and quieter computing
100% factory tested"

Hence, impact series of modules do have auto-overclocking feature apart from fury series as well.

My real confusion is, whether I should go with G.skill or hyperx? Also will the auto-overclocking feature give an edge over g.skill in real time or heavy work or gaming?

 
Interesting. Wasn't aware that the Impact (SODIMM) series were auto overclocking as well.

Auto overclocking has no advantage over manual overclocking as far as performance is concerned. All auto overclocking does is make it easier and quicker to set up the BIOS to make memory to run at higher frequencies. As long as manual memory overclocking settings match those of the settings made by auto overclocking (voltage, frequency, timings), then performance will be the same.

Go for memory that is cheapest and has the lowest CL for the frequency rating of the module. Both Kingston memory and G.Skill memory are OK, so either brand will do.
 

charitarthlal

Commendable
Aug 11, 2016
5
0
1,510


Okay,
I have one last query regarding the modules. The thing that is stuck to the front in both modules where they have their respective logos, are these just stickers or are these heat spreaders? Also in g.skill, they have it on both sides and in hyperx they have it one only one side. Does it make any difference? Also do G.skill ones have 8 bit data width?
Thanks in advance. This will help me a lot to decide my purchase.
 
Basically just type of stickers which may give the appearance of heat spreaders in some cases, but are not really required to be used as heat spreaders on SODIMM's because SODIMM's are not usually heavily overclocked and/or not run in hot environment compared to desktop systems.

By far, most UDIMM's and SODIMM's use 8 bit data width. But a few may use 16 bit or 4 bit here and there, but that is rare for UDIMM's and SODIMM's.
 

charitarthlal

Commendable
Aug 11, 2016
5
0
1,510


Thanks a ton for all the help and support from your end. Your detailed and well explained answers helped me decide my purchase. I finally went with HyperX modules. Best Regards.