Greetings
My specs: Asus M5A97 , AMD FX 8350 , Kingston Hyper X 2 x 4GB 1600mhz , Sapphire R9 380 , Kingston UV400 240GB SSD , Windows 7 sp1 .
As the title says i am wondering whether my new SSD is working properly. Coming from an 7 year old WD HDD i was expecting to see quite the difference. Well i am not really noticing that much of a change. Sure its faster a bit but that could also be the fresh install of windows. A fresh install of windows is always reasonably quick and responsive, even on an old HDD.
It takes 30 seconds to boot up to the desktop. Is that slow? I have connected the SSD to the first sata 3 port and AHCI is set in BIOS. According to kingston SSD manager there are no firmware upgrades for my SSD.
Here are some benchmarks :
Crystaldiskmark : https://postimg.org/image/h535cnkeh/
ATTO : https://postimg.org/image/hp8uca3tr/
AS SSD : https://postimg.org/image/72tb0t0q7/
Is that ok performance?
My specs: Asus M5A97 , AMD FX 8350 , Kingston Hyper X 2 x 4GB 1600mhz , Sapphire R9 380 , Kingston UV400 240GB SSD , Windows 7 sp1 .
As the title says i am wondering whether my new SSD is working properly. Coming from an 7 year old WD HDD i was expecting to see quite the difference. Well i am not really noticing that much of a change. Sure its faster a bit but that could also be the fresh install of windows. A fresh install of windows is always reasonably quick and responsive, even on an old HDD.
It takes 30 seconds to boot up to the desktop. Is that slow? I have connected the SSD to the first sata 3 port and AHCI is set in BIOS. According to kingston SSD manager there are no firmware upgrades for my SSD.
Here are some benchmarks :
Crystaldiskmark : https://postimg.org/image/h535cnkeh/
ATTO : https://postimg.org/image/hp8uca3tr/
AS SSD : https://postimg.org/image/72tb0t0q7/
Is that ok performance?