T The_Prince2017 Reputable Feb 29, 2016 123 0 4,710 Aug 20, 2016 #1 1280 cores at 2000 Mhz or 2560 cores at 1000 Mhz. Assuming all other things are the same. No boost clocks and overclocking options.
1280 cores at 2000 Mhz or 2560 cores at 1000 Mhz. Assuming all other things are the same. No boost clocks and overclocking options.
B burgessanthony Dignified Jun 27, 2012 3,016 4 13,960 Aug 20, 2016 #2 Context? If from the same generation I'd expect largely the same performance (doubling shaders whilst halving speed). Upvote 0 Downvote
Context? If from the same generation I'd expect largely the same performance (doubling shaders whilst halving speed).
T The_Prince2017 Reputable Feb 29, 2016 123 0 4,710 Aug 20, 2016 #3 Oops! Yeah, the same generation. Yes the performance will be very similar. Which would you prefer though. Upvote 0 Downvote
Oops! Yeah, the same generation. Yes the performance will be very similar. Which would you prefer though.
P pete_101 Splendid Aug 2, 2014 2,988 129 23,890 Aug 20, 2016 #4 I would always take twice the hardware at half the speed, because it should run much cooler. Upvote 0 Downvote
B burgessanthony Dignified Jun 27, 2012 3,016 4 13,960 Aug 20, 2016 #5 Op - might help if you tell us what you are comparing? Upvote 0 Downvote
T The_Prince2017 Reputable Feb 29, 2016 123 0 4,710 Aug 20, 2016 #7 I am not comparing any specific GPUs. It's just.... don't know. Upvote 0 Downvote
stark11 Honorable Nov 10, 2012 17 0 10,520 Aug 20, 2016 #8 he is "on" something, or on withdrawal from something (mostly am like this on weekend and Monday mornings..... ) Upvote 0 Downvote
he is "on" something, or on withdrawal from something (mostly am like this on weekend and Monday mornings..... )