USB 3.0 header to SATA?

Trenavix

Commendable
Sep 11, 2016
5
0
1,510
So I'm thinking of doing a mini ITX build since I travel so much. Problem is, the case I'm thinking of getting has an ODD slot able to fit my USB 3.0 SD card reader bay, which has two USB 3.0 ports. Since the case has 2 USB 3.0 ports as well, this is where normal people get a PCIe adapter to be able to have 4 slots. However on an ITX, the only PCIe slot is the x16 for the GPU.

I came about to thinking "how can I get this usb 3.0 into the motherboard at full speed," and looking at connections, I focused on SATA. Is this a legit method?

1.) Plug bay into this Female to Male

2.) Plug that into this USB 3.0 to dual SATA

3.) Plug two SATA cables from that into my motherboard

Does that even work? This whole project is starting to confuse the hell out of me lol
 
Solution

Alec Lockhart

Honorable
Sep 24, 2014
181
0
10,760
Unfortunately, I believe the USB 3.0 to SATA would be running opposite of intended use. That adapter is intended to be used to expand SATA via USB 3.0.

I would be a little cautious on this one, most adapters do not operate in reverse. However, it does confuse me as well... I do have a USB 3.0 HDD reader (Takes normal internal 3.5" HDD) that converts SATA III into USB 3.0. This being said, I have found no adapters that can do such a thing with the internal headers. It looks like it can be done, but there might not be a large market for it.

Is there no USB 3.0 header on the Mobo?
 

Trenavix

Commendable
Sep 11, 2016
5
0
1,510


Yeah, that was my only red flag, the SATA adapter's objective was reversed.
There is one header, but the goal is 4 front USB 3.0 ports. I cannot find any mobo with 2 headers. Do you think I'd get decent speed if I was to use a USB 3.0 splitter on a mobo with a USB 3.1 header?
 

Alec Lockhart

Honorable
Sep 24, 2014
181
0
10,760


That should work perfectly fine. You should not notice a decrease in performance.
 
Solution

Trenavix

Commendable
Sep 11, 2016
5
0
1,510


I read that it had twice the bandwidth of 3.0 so I figured that might be a solution. Looks to be true. Guess that'll be my route! Thanks man