Originally I was going for the 950 or Rx460, but people convinced me to go for at least a 1060.
I noticed the 1060 is 200$, and then noticed the Rx 470 for 200$.
I checked the passmark of the 1060 which scored a 9175, and the Rx 470 has a score of 7398.
I know the score of the 1060 is higher but I hear rumors that you cannot judge a card based off of its scores sometimes.
So the 1060 has a performance edge over the Rx 470 supposedly, but the Rx 470 has an extra gigabyte of RAM, having 4gb rather than 3gb.
For some reason I feel like if people played with 2gb for one screen, than a second screen would need 4gb, and now each screen only gets 1.5gb with the 1060, whereas each have 2gb with the 470.
So has more raw performance but one has more memory, and this is tripping me up.
Maybe the 1060 does not require so much memory due to pascal but then I note that AMD allows more control over their cards and allows more lenient crossfire options and then I think that that might not matter because VR does not heavily use SLI or crossfire and then I think what if they implement it. Then I remember that GeForce is a software experience rather than AMD but then I think maybe thats just marketing creating false memories.
Does anyone know if I should go with nvidia or amd xd?
I am considering raw performance, vram, pascal, and just the fact that I hear amd has more options and that nvidia is a better software.
So far the pascal (and slightly higher raw passmark score) really makes me want to choose nvidia but that extra gb of vram makes me want to choose amd. Does amd have their own vr drivers similar to pascal?
I noticed the 1060 is 200$, and then noticed the Rx 470 for 200$.
I checked the passmark of the 1060 which scored a 9175, and the Rx 470 has a score of 7398.
I know the score of the 1060 is higher but I hear rumors that you cannot judge a card based off of its scores sometimes.
So the 1060 has a performance edge over the Rx 470 supposedly, but the Rx 470 has an extra gigabyte of RAM, having 4gb rather than 3gb.
For some reason I feel like if people played with 2gb for one screen, than a second screen would need 4gb, and now each screen only gets 1.5gb with the 1060, whereas each have 2gb with the 470.
So has more raw performance but one has more memory, and this is tripping me up.
Maybe the 1060 does not require so much memory due to pascal but then I note that AMD allows more control over their cards and allows more lenient crossfire options and then I think that that might not matter because VR does not heavily use SLI or crossfire and then I think what if they implement it. Then I remember that GeForce is a software experience rather than AMD but then I think maybe thats just marketing creating false memories.
Does anyone know if I should go with nvidia or amd xd?
I am considering raw performance, vram, pascal, and just the fact that I hear amd has more options and that nvidia is a better software.
So far the pascal (and slightly higher raw passmark score) really makes me want to choose nvidia but that extra gb of vram makes me want to choose amd. Does amd have their own vr drivers similar to pascal?