I have a gtx 1080 strix addition pared with a i5 four core cpu. I was told that getting a gtx 1080 is over kill for 1080p however from my experience so far I still have been getting titles such as gears of war 4, deux ex mankind divided,rise of the tombraider dipping to the 40 fps area and for gears of war sometimes in the 30fps area. I hear a lot of people claim that the gtx is overkill when it comes to 1080p gaming at ultra settings, but if a game at 1080p still pushes the gtx so hard that it dips to the low 40s then that means it is being pushed to hard. I dont see how people even play at 1440p seeing as it would even further limit fps let alone 4k. Is it perhaps that my gtx is faulty and I should return it, or would me getting an i7 make that much of a difference. I was told an i5 should be sufficient enough as the graphics card itself does most of the work. I am using a terabyte hardrive not ssd but I was told that just improves load times which I dont mind, doesn't necessarily improve fps when in game playing. I already updated all my drivers according to GeforceExperince Nividia. Is this Unusual or are other people experiencing the same thing. Valley engine benchmark says my gtx averages 102 at ultra settings. deus ex mankind divided at ultra settings no mssa says average 77.7fps. Gears of war 4 benchmark states i think it said 93.7 settings on ultra. Sure thats sounds ok but actually playing the games its a slightly different experience. What should I look into?