Low FPS GTX 1070 + 6600k Battlefield 1

HomelessObama

Commendable
Jul 22, 2016
7
0
1,510
So over the past few days I've been having lower FPS than I'm expecting based on benchmarks, in multiplayer whenever there is too many effects onscreen my fps can drop down to 30. I get normally about 40-70 FPS on Ultra preset.
 

amtseung

Distinguished
Particles and shadows are the two settings in every game that absolutely murder a CPU. Unless PhysX is there to handle the particles for your CPU (but PhysX is riddled with bugs), you'll have to turn down a little eye candy to get good framerates when the going gets tough. It gets worse when the CPU has to draw shadows for each particle of dirt that gets flung up from every stray bullet and exploding grenade, let alone that collapsing airship.

If you can overclock that 6600k, you might be able to alleviate a little bit of that strain, but it still won't be too pretty. Your best bet is to turn down the CPU-intensive eye candy, of which includes, but is not limited to, particles, shadows, ambient occlusion, draw distance, LOD scaling, and audio quality.
 
Op something is seriously not right. The game is more than capable of being run in ultra at north of 100fps with your specs. You shouldn't be seeing 40-70fps.

I would overclock. At stock the 6600k.sits near 100%....a 25% oc to 4.3/4.4 can seriously help..

What is your ram speed?
 

HomelessObama

Commendable
Jul 22, 2016
7
0
1,510


16 gb ripjaws gskill X
 

Daemonski

Commendable
Nov 3, 2016
1
0
1,510
Check the advandced graphics options within BF1 and look at the scaler resolution. This has a massive impact on FPS. I have the GTX1070 AMP Extreme and was getting FPS in the thirties and forties when set to 150, but got FPS of about 110 when set to 68. So it's just a case of setting this value to what suits you. By the way I am running 5760x1080p (using 6700k @4.6GHZ), so you should be getting bigger numbers than I am seeing. Whilst I would expect the 6600K to have a similar OC to mine, I would not expect that you need to OC your card. Fingers crossed it's the game setting.
 

amtseung

Distinguished
Well, setting a resolution scaling over 100(%) is the same as artificially inducing SMAA, which is really taxing on the entire system, especially the GPU's memory bus.

An OC on the GPU might help things keep up, but with architectures this finely tuned, I don't think you'll get much of a real world benefit from an overclock unless you get a magical flying rainbow unicorn GPU that goes to like 2500mhz+ on the core or something on air.

An OC on the CPU, however, would help a bit more. Like most MMO's, regardless of API, single core performance is still pretty important, at least to processing the incoming information from the server, and clock speed scales single core performance pretty linearly until instability prevails. It's like running my i5 4460 at 3.8ghz versus 3.2ghz. I had mad FPS gains all across the board, and up to an extra 40% decrease in frame times in really heavy MMO's like Planetside 2 and TERA and BnS. I undid the overclock because I'm technically still under Intel warranty, and now I can't overclock it anymore. Derp.

Turning off framerate smoothing, vsync, and some extraneous windows services can give you back some fpses too.

I agree with burgessanthony. Dropping the resolution scaling is usually an attempt to drop VRAM usage, and not much else (the only thing it really affects from my testing, anyway). You'd get a bigger change turning off foliage or shadows or fog volume individually versus dropping the resolution scaling, and if you're that worried about VRAM usage, dropping the anti-aliasing settings or turning them off entirely will give you back more free VRAM than resolution scaling. Resolution scaling is typically a last-ditch effort for extra framerates with not much benefit and lots of drawbacks.
 

itsjinxxx

Commendable
Jan 9, 2017
1
0
1,510


Just checking you're sure your RAM is in Dual-Channel configuration, not single. My friend had an issue similar to this, and it was resolved by correcting his RAM config.
 

Refresher

Commendable
Feb 12, 2017
5
0
1,510
hey i have the same specs as u...
i5 6600k 4,6GHz
KFA2 gtx 1070 sniper edition EXOC
16gb ddr4 HyperX Furion single
asus z710pro gaming
...
i have maybe too low fps to cause i have 50-95fps in bf1 and average 105fps in bf4. do u really think that dual channel is the right way to get the common amount of fps? because i heard that a broken damaged cpu could be a issue to... try a firestrike benchmark 2x times or more and see the results... if u have different points then maybe is the cpu the issue... maybe. why i say this...? simply i have the exact issues like u (even in FUCKING CSGO i have 110fps WTF) but 2 day before this post i played bf4 with IMBA 190fps. later i turned the resolution from 100% to 200% and its still 100fps... so our isue isnt sadly the gpu(in bf1 i had 90-100fps average. 1month ago i thought so but i´ve got another one and its the same. and well today i play bf4 in 100fps in 100% res. (sad story) and bf1 is also less better like bf4 in my situation. what i want to say is that ram could be the way but im not sure to since i had the IMBA 190fps on my system by bf4 so the logical way i think is that the cpu could be the problem. i unparked the cpu ofc to today and still no changes in the performance. can somene tell me why i had one lucky session in bf4 with 190fps and now not? my plans are to send my cpu back to the online shop and look (and pray) for a better conclusion.

p.s bad english maybe cause im from germany and i write like brainstorming in such things^^
 

sadisticbadger0125

Reputable
Nov 13, 2015
260
0
4,780


I have the same specs but my 6600k is overclocked to 4.3 and I average around maybe 40 fps
 

Latest posts