is rx 480 4gb severely problematic with direct x 11

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
B

bigjohnny

Reputable
May 20, 2016
539
1
4,985
the gtx 1060 6gb is over budget and so is the rx 480 8gb will they be any bottlenecks fps drop in games and i do not plan to upgrade to win 10 i want to play games at ultra

win 7 sp1 ultimate 64bit
resolution 1366x768
gigabyte ga h97m d3h
intel i5 4590(getting soon)
antec earthwatts 650w 80+bronze
kingston hyperx blue 8gb 1866
1tb hard drive seagate
 
Solution
Supernova1138
The GTX 1060 6GB is a bit faster than the RX 480 in DirectX 11 titles. That said, at that low a resolution the difference between the two is going to be largely academic as both will easily get you 60FPS and anything beyond that isn't going to be all that beneficial since there aren't any 1366x768 displays that can refresh higher than 60Hz.
Sort by date Sort by votes
Supernova1138

Supernova1138

Illustrious
Mar 22, 2011
5,340
54
37,690
The GTX 1060 6GB is a bit faster than the RX 480 in DirectX 11 titles. That said, at that low a resolution the difference between the two is going to be largely academic as both will easily get you 60FPS and anything beyond that isn't going to be all that beneficial since there aren't any 1366x768 displays that can refresh higher than 60Hz.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Solution
B

bigjohnny

Reputable
May 20, 2016
539
1
4,985


future proof?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
genthug

genthug

Honorable
Mar 20, 2016
1,649
0
12,460
On 1366*768? Given that the number of pixels in the screen is ~50% of what you need to fill on a FHD screen, it will have the power to do what you want it to for a fairly long time, but that depends on you not getting a better screen. If you're even slightly interested in getting a better monitor, I would go with the 1060/480.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom