nigelivey :
As stated above port mirroring will only allow you to monitor as the traffic doesn't pass through the port. 60Mb is indeed an issue even with contention. 65 Condos? Even with just a couple in each not counting children it's a push.
Do you sell this service to the inhabitants? What sort of security do you have on the switches or router to prevent condo 1 seeing information from condo 30???
I'm sticking with Pfsense as a solution to all the problems you are facing but I would be interested how you are trunking the switches on each floor? Is this just a flat topology?
Pf would allow you to segregate the network to provide better security and reduce network overhead thus preserving bandwidth. It would allow you to control user bandwidth so that when few people consuming bandwidth they can share the 60Mb but when saturated a fair use policy is in effect. The point of the Qs is that instead of a flat 1Mb per user limit it round robins the bandwidth so that it dynamically bursts connections. This way the full force of the limit is rarely felt.
If you are selling the service make it worthwhile, charge extra and bring in a second 60Mb line!
60Mbps service is adequate for the demographics of our building which is located in foreign country and has been adequate for several years. Its rare we have a problem.
In a way we are selling the service but its at cost. Since we are a condo associations its considered common services and cost is passed on condo owners. At current exchange rates its cost each owner $5 dollars a month.
We have a switch (unmanaged) on each floor and I thought switches routed traffic based on NIC address which should prevent condo 1 seeing condo 30 traffic.
Our router has bandwidth management using rate control(by IP address or services) or priority(for services) management. In the past bandwidth management has ever been used but we are now considering which options we will use.