RX 460 Strix or GTX 1050 TI Expedition

Solution
70° C is nothing for a GPU at full load, so don't let that influence your decision.

The RX 470 is considerably faster than the GTX 1050 Ti, so if you can save for it, then you should.

Bayangan

Commendable
Feb 21, 2016
57
0
1,630


900p. high. 30++, gta v, doom 4, dying light
 


Actually, for the first two 60fps is well within reach in those games with either card, Dying Light may run a touch slower. Here's some benchmarks for Doom and GTA V:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1050-ti,4787-4.html
 

Bayangan

Commendable
Feb 21, 2016
57
0
1,630
yes i only want to choose between this two, btw, my graphic card right now, 560ti direct cu II, run very hot, i cleaned the dust yesterday, i downclocked it and boost up the fan to max (100) and still get 70 degrees celcius on full load. that's why i dont want to pick Nvidia cards anymore...before that, i have my hd 7770 direct cu I, I overclocked it a huge amount and fan below 30 get 60 degrees celcius in full load...

in conclusion, i know 1050 TI is a LOT faster than rx 460, but i dont want that kind of problem happen to me again,
should i buy the RX 460 Strix? or save a little bit more for RX 470?
 


with fermi generation nvidia are more power hungry than AMD. but it is not really fair to compare 560ti vs 7770 either. because 560ti is build on 40nm node while 7770 is built on more power efficient 28nm node. so 7770 going to release mcu h less heat than 560ti is to be expected. and they also affected by the cooler performance. though more power hungry gpu would always release more heat even if the load temperature are the same with less power hungry gpu.