Hyper 212 evo vs Corsair H100i

FnaticMeister

Respectable
Aug 9, 2016
312
0
1,860
Hi, I'm overclocking the i5-6600k maybe to 4.2 to 4.5 ghz. Not that much, but I was wondering if I should get the h100i or the hyper 212 evo. I was more leaning to the 212 evo because the H100i would mean I would have to go over my $1000 budget, only for a little better cooling. Want your suggestions!
 
Solution
The Hyper 212 and h100i are very, very, very different animals in very different proce tiers.

1. The 212 is a "great budget cooler", emphasis on the middle word. Don't expect it to perform in any way like the H100i.

2. peeps assume water cooling is 'better" than air cooling. When we are talking about CLCs, nothing could be further from the truth. The Noctua NH-D15 is generally regarded as today's flagship air cooler ... it delivered temps of 71C in hightechlegion's testing (see 17:10 mark in video below) while the H100i delivered 73C .... probably thinking that 2C is not a big deal until you consider that in order to get that close, the H100i was twelve (12) times as loud,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TivNOgQqW-M

3...
The Hyper 212 and h100i are very, very, very different animals in very different proce tiers.

1. The 212 is a "great budget cooler", emphasis on the middle word. Don't expect it to perform in any way like the H100i.

2. peeps assume water cooling is 'better" than air cooling. When we are talking about CLCs, nothing could be further from the truth. The Noctua NH-D15 is generally regarded as today's flagship air cooler ... it delivered temps of 71C in hightechlegion's testing (see 17:10 mark in video below) while the H100i delivered 73C .... probably thinking that 2C is not a big deal until you consider that in order to get that close, the H100i was twelve (12) times as loud,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TivNOgQqW-M

3. Essentially it's a budget question:

Air Coolers
$25 - Hyper 212
$35 - Cryorig H7
$45 to $55 - various Scythe Coolers
$65 - Phanteks PH-TC14-PE
$85 - Noctua NH-D15

All in One Water Coolers
CLC type coolers use aluminum radiators, Because of aluminum's heat transfer capability is substantially lower than copper, this requires extreme rpm (read "very loud") fans for them to get even close to air cooler performance. Besides being louder than air coolers by several orders of magnitude, they also mix metals (aluminum rad / copper block) which is a huge no-no in water cooling

https://martinsliquidlab.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/corrosion-explored/

As such, I have no CLCs on this list. In the world of quality All-in-One water cooling, Swiftech is the market leader followed by EK, but the later is much more expensive. Other CLC manufacturers have been making forays here but have yet to see anything that impresses as yet.

With a $1,00o system budget, you are not going to be playing here. A 2 x 120 rad system from Swiftech, pre-assembled with tad, pump and reservoir is $140 ... 2 x $140 is $150 ... 3 x 120mm is $165
 
Solution

Globespy

Distinguished
Feb 8, 2017
15
2
18,525


Interesting response and appreciate the articles on corrosion, quite interesting. In the high performance PC world, most people change their rigs every 3 years (or less) so the corrosion part is a moot point, the exceptions aside. If corrosion was such a major issue there would be a lot of information, because people take so much more time to write bad reviews than when stuff just works. I can't find much here, so it's isolated cases.

Where your argument for Swiftech kinda falls to pieces is in their product reviews. For anyone looking at say their H240-X2 unit versus Corsair's H115i unit, there's clearly a reason why nearly 4000 people chose the latter and only 12 people bought the Swiftech unit and reviews were average at best.
You may argue that the 4000 people are simply uninformed galoots, but if you are a man that dabbles in statistics, I'd bet that the ratio of highly informed buyers in a 4000 person control group to a 12 person one would heavily overwhelm anything you just said.
The numbers don't lie. Even if a good portion of reviews for the corsair were 'plants', once again statistically speaking it's still the better choice based on tenure and quantity of consistently similar reviews. There's a strong pattern that indicates it's a high quality unit.
Corrosion potential aside, I'd put my money there......like the other 4000.