Well, my PC is currently running the G4400 without dedicated GPU. I build a PC as an HTPC and planned to purchase a graphics card eventually. But when I test to play DOTA 2, it runs well mid settings with an average of 30 FPS.
But I see the difference of Intel HD 510 compared with HD 530, the improvement boost up to 82% in performance. Well, I'm just playing for leisure (DOTA 2 only).
My logic is if the HD 530 gives 82% improvement therefore the FPS will increase 82% as well, so I'll get an average of 50 - 60 FPS in my current settings or I can ON the additional graphics settings of the game and get a much decent graphics performance.
You can check the benchmark here http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-HD-510-Desktop-Skylake-vs-Intel-HD-530-Desktop-Skylake/m38088vsm33102
Purchasing a GT 730 is a waste of money because there's no difference compared with 510, so should I sell my G4400 and buy an i3-6100?
But I see the difference of Intel HD 510 compared with HD 530, the improvement boost up to 82% in performance. Well, I'm just playing for leisure (DOTA 2 only).
My logic is if the HD 530 gives 82% improvement therefore the FPS will increase 82% as well, so I'll get an average of 50 - 60 FPS in my current settings or I can ON the additional graphics settings of the game and get a much decent graphics performance.
You can check the benchmark here http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-HD-510-Desktop-Skylake-vs-Intel-HD-530-Desktop-Skylake/m38088vsm33102
Purchasing a GT 730 is a waste of money because there's no difference compared with 510, so should I sell my G4400 and buy an i3-6100?